MBS, Ltd. (Ukraine)
Zhukovskogo 22
Odessa, Ukraine 65026
Tel: +380 48 796-5208

MBS Blog

The Day to Day of Trade and Business

Posts Tagged ‘Russia’

Money from Abroad

Monday, December 8th, 2008

One of the side effects of the Global Economic Crisis-and we have to come up with a new name for this “crisis,” is the steep falloff in the amount of money sent home by immigrants and workers abroad. Many emerging market economies depend on this income to sustain themselves. The fallout from the falloff could be huge…..

 

Falling remittances to hit CIS
 
 

Clare Nuttall in Almaty 
December 8, 2008   

As the world’s rich economies sink into recession, the flow of remittances into developing countries is expected to see a corresponding decrease. In the CIS countries that rely heavily on payments from migrant workers abroad, the effect could be highly damaging. The construction and consumer-related sectors are expected to be particularly badly hit. 

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) forecasts a drop of 6% in remittance payments to developing countries from their nationals working abroad in 2009. CIS countries are among the largest recipients of remittance payments measured in comparison to their GDP. 

The Remittances Factbook 2008, published by the World Bank, finds that Tajikistan and Moldova are tied as the top remittance receiving countries – remittance inflows amount to 36% of their GDP. One NGO worker in Tajikistan reports seeing a jet leave from Dushanbe every week to Moscow, with 500 young men on board, while observers of the Moldovan market joke that “will the last Moldovan left please turn off the light.” Other CIS countries are also high on the list: Kyrgyzstan was in 4th place, with transfers from migrants equal to 27% of its GDP; in Armenia the figure is 18%. Only Russia and Kazakhstan have net outflows of money. 

Speaking at the World Bank/IMF annual meeting recently, Shigeo Katsu, World Bank vice president for Europe and Central Asia, warned: “This money sent back home is second only to foreign direct investment as a source of external finance across the region, and is the largest source of external finance for a number of low income and lower middle income countries.” 

Laid low 

There are already signs the flow of money into the CIS’ poorer economies is tailing off as the US and West European economies suffer from the second wave of the credit crisis, while the previously strong growth in Russia and Kazakhstan dissipates – forecasts for 2009 are 3% and 2.7-4.1% respectively. 

Reliable data on the situation in Central Asia is hard to come by, but anecdotal evidence suggests that migrant workers from Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan were the first to be laid off when work slowed or stopped at Kazakhstan’s construction sites. In Moscow and other Russian cities, many sites are also staffed by workers from other CIS countries. As in Kazakhstan, the Russian government has recently announced it will take measures to shore up the struggling construction sector. 

A slowing of growth in the Russian economy is likely to be particularly damaging to Armenia, where 70% of remittances are sent from Russia; the amount is closely correlated with Russian GDP. Meanwhile, Moldova has seen many migrants return home in recent months, according to Matthias Lücke, senior economist at the Kiel Institute and head of the institute’s project on migrant remittances in CIS countries. “Based on the available statistics, the number of migrants is now lower than a year ago, by one fifth,” says Matthias Lücke, though he points out that there has not yet been a decline in remittances, according to available data. 

The Kyrgyz government has already sounded the alarm. Economy Minister Akylbek Japarov warned in November that the international crisis could tip the country into financial collapse. He forecast that both FDI and remittances to the country would fall steeply in 2009, with a damaging effect on the already struggling. “Our government is in real terms on the threshold of a financial crisis. A decline in Kyrgyzstan’s economic situation is quite possible by February or March 2009,” Japarov said in a televised address. 

Aside from consumption, the sector that has benefited the most from remittance inflows is real estate. Poor business environments and under-developed stock markets mean there are few alternatives to investing in real estate - aside from saving abroad or keeping their money under the mattress. As a result, the housing sectors in most of these countries have boomed lately, out of proportion to continuing low wage levels. 

“What do migrants do with their money? The business climate in Moldova is so awful that unless you are well connected, you can’t invest it in the country since everyone will be demanding payoffs,” says Lücke. “The options are to renovate your house, to keep it under the mattress or to save it abroad in preparation for when you emigrate permanently. People are also buying real estate in the capital – there is a real property bubble for apartments in Chisinau.” The cost of an apartment in Chisinau increased on average by 5.5% in September 2008, and new buildings are still going up – the city mayor recently unveiled the Malldova shopping centre and at one upscale estate, developers are throwing in a free car with each house bought. 

Real estate prices in both Bishkek and Dushanbe have increased rapidly in recent years. In Armenia, where money transfers are highly correlated to real estate prices, according to the IMF the construction sector overtook industrial production this year to become the largest sector of the economy, accounting for 23.2% of GDP. But just as this happened, the trend started to reverse. After seven years of continuous growth in real estate prices, a slight fall was recorded in 2008, said government agency State Real Property Cadastre. Prices in central Yerevan have fallen by an average of 3%, while in the rest of the country they are down by an average of 1.5%. There was also an 11% year-on-year decrease in the number of property deals registered from August through September. A similar story can be expected in other economies highly reliant on remittances. 

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Wealth & Health of Nations

Saturday, December 6th, 2008

 

 

This article is from one of our favorite bloggers: Mike Hewitt provides the “big picture” of individual nations relative to the global economy.  The picture is not pretty for many.

http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/dollardaze/2008/1205.html

 

 

The extreme level of public debt in developed nations in particular…and these charts don’t measure corporate and private debt…portend an almost certain re-alignment of economic power.  China for example, can be compared to the United States at the beginning of the 20th century. The United States is now like post World War II Britain. It may never fully recover.

The  result of the changes is the full emergence of transition economies.  Unburdened by massive debt, with growth oriented economies that have incorporated  free market mechanisms,  emerging market economies could  take the lead a lot faster than previously reckoned. Indeed, that may be the “silver lining” in the current economic cloud.

 

 

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fast Food & Lean Times

Friday, December 5th, 2008

The global economic slowdown has not slowed the consumption of fast food. On the contrary, the one thing to count on is the continuation in the growth of inexpensive fast food in emerging markets like Russia and Ukraine.

Fast food-whether it is purchased at a kiosk or market- is generally priced competitively… and is viewed as an affordable luxury, especially during lean times. It is also viewed as the type of consumable that brings a degree of  “comfort,” similar to tobacco, coffee and alcohol.

As the video below  from the Russian News & Information Agency (NOVISTI) at www.en.rian.ru/ the perceived unhealthiness of this type of food is not high on the list of Muscovites……

 

 

 

9:12 04/12/2008

 

Crisis has Muscovites switching from fine food to fast food

 

Nutritionists say the global crisis favors healthy nutrition, but add that many will confine themselves to unhealthy instant coffee and quick-cooking noodles. (109 sec./4.06Mb, shows: 33)

 

 

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

NO politics please, however…………

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

The unwritten rule regarding the blog here at MBS, Ltd., was that we would focus on macro & micro economic and business issues ONLY. We would not stray into the murky and dangerous waters of politics.

Having stated such, we decided to dive into the political pool (or cesspool?) with this entry. The motivation for this diversion is the topicality and relationship of the subject matter to BUSINESS in emerging markets like Eastern Europe, Russia, Georgia and Ukraine. The subject is NATO.

Nick Witney’s article in the Moscow Times (www.moscowtimes.ru) captures, dissects and congeals the truth like few others have recently.  The fact is, NATO in its current form is an obsolete, expensive and largely political club, where military and security matters are of primary importance mainly to its newest members and aspirants.

The subject of NATO is a divisive issue here in Ukraine, as well as further east.  The inclusion or exclusion of Ukraine and Georgia into the current NATO organization, will affect the economic direction of these nations.

Some argue very coherently, that a byproduct of NATO inclusion is the acceleration of political-or what we could call “philosophic integration” between new members and “the West,” as well as increased trade. The hope among the practitioners of “realpolitik” in the West, is that an expanded NATO will act as a check on Russian, as well as Asian influence and ambitions in Europe.

The main problem with this thesis is that it ignores the weakness of NATO and the shifting alliances that have resulted.

The Death of NATO

02 December 2008

By Nick Witney

NATO, whose foreign ministers will meet Tuesday and Wednesday, is dying. Death, of course, comes to all living things. And, as NATO approaches its 60th birthday next spring, there seems no immediate urgency about writing its obituary; 60-year-olds may reasonably look forward to another decade — perhaps two or even three — of active and productive life. But perhaps it is now time for some discrete reflection on the fact that “the old man” will not always be with us.

Human institutions, like human beings, can collapse with surprising speed once they have outlived their usefulness. The dramatic dissolution of the Soviet Union stands as a reminder of what can happen to organizations when doubts take hold as to whether they still serve any real interests other than those of their own apparatchiks — and how suddenly such doubts can grow when they attempt to convert themselves into something they are not. 

NATO has, of course, shown remarkable tenacity. It should have disappeared when the Soviet Union collapsed and the Warsaw Pact evaporated because its job was done. But then came the Balkan crises of the 1990s, culminating in the realization that only U.S. military power could put a stop to Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic’s ethnic cleansing of Kosovo. And then came the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and this kept NATO in business, spreading its activities to Afghanistan. 

But NATO’s repeated demonstrations of resilience should not blind us to the fact that it no longer provides a healthy basis for the transatlantic security relationship. As long as NATO’s raison d’etre was to keep the Russians out and the United States in, NATO’s internal dynamic of U.S. leadership and European obeisance was both inevitable and appropriate. 

This unbalanced relationship still has advantages for both parties. Americans may find their European allies less pliable than before, but they can at least count on the absence of any serious alternatives for what NATO should become or what it should do. Europeans can continue to avoid responsibility for their own security and to invoke the catechism of “NATO — the cornerstone of our security” as a substitute for serious strategic thought. 

But each now resents the behavior of the other. Americans find their patience tried by Europeans who are free with their advice and criticism, yet reluctant to shoulder risks. Moreover, the United States learned from the Kosovo experience of “war by committee” to distrust NATO as a place to run operations, and now Afghanistan highlights the organization’s limitations as a mechanism for generating force contributions. 

As for Europeans, they are unhappy about pressure to participate in a U.S.-led “global war on terror” that they regard as dangerous and misconceived. They are also averse to policies seemingly designed to antagonize their more difficult neighbors like Russia and the Islamic world. 

So what is to be done? None of the ideas for another dose of NATO rejuvenation looks like the answer. All the talk of an improved NATO-European Union partnership is mainly wasted breath. “Intensified strategic dialogue in Brussels,” in practice, boils down to the chilling specter of interminable joint committee meetings at which one nation’s ambassador to NATO explains his government’s position to a compatriot diplomat who is accredited to the EU and vice-versa. 

The problem is not institutional relationships between the two organizations — except in the important but narrow case of Turkey and Cyprus, which remain bent on pursuing their bilateral feud without regard to the real risks to the personnel of their allies and partners deployed in Afghanistan and Kosovo. The real problem is relations between the United States and European countries, 21 of which belong to both organizations. 

Nor does the answer lie in developing an EU “caucus” within NATO. The 1990s concept of a “European Defense Identity” within NATO proved to be unviable. Since then, expansion of the alliance and proliferation of NATO “partners” has made the idea of a special collective role for EU members all the more improbable. A double layer of decision-making would only cause an already ponderous organization to seize up. 

There is nothing more dramatic to be done than to focus on upgrading the EU-U.S. strategic dialogue. The annual summits need to be made more substantial, and their focus needs to shift from transatlantic, bilateral issues to aligning EU and U.S. global policies and actions. President-elect Barack Obama should keep an eye on the calendar of the European Council, which brings the EU presidents and prime ministers together four times a year, and solicit an occasional invitation. The U.S. mission to the EU should be scaled up, and the EU representation in Washington needs to become a proper embassy. The more seriously the Americans show that they are willing to take the EU collectively, the more seriously the Europeans will take themselves. 

Winston Churchill once remarked that you could always count on the Americans to do the right thing — after having tried all the alternatives. In the same way, the Europeans will eventually find themselves having to speak with one voice and act as one body in the wider world, if only because a globalized world will not allow them the luxury of doing anything else. As Charles de Gaulle forecasted: “It is not any European statesman who will unite Europe. Europe will be united by the Chinese.” Only collectively can Europeans be effective contributors to global security or achieve a robust transatlantic security partnership. 

As NATO enters its twilight years, the United States should encourage the EU to grow into its global responsibilities. Despite all their differences and mutual dissatisfactions, Europe and the United States know that their relationship is as close to being best friends as they are likely to see for the foreseeable future. 

Nick Witney, former chief executive of the European Defense Agency, is a senior policy fellow with the European Council on Foreign Relations. © Project Syndicate

 

 

 

Anton Olff

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Privatization Opportunities

Monday, December 1st, 2008

Someone in Russia understands a thing or two about the benefits of competition. As this article from the Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com) indicates, the privatization of one of Moscow’s airports, has been positive.

As a frequent traveler to Moscow , the privatized Domodedovo Airport is the preferred choice.  Modern, clean and efficient…with decent food for the international traveler, it is a stark contrast to the international terminal at Sheremetyevo Airport. The dark brown paint at Sheremetyevo may have been whitewashed, but the depressing feeling lingers for travelers and airport workers there.

 While government investment in Sheremetyevo Airport will certainly improve the overall quality, the privatized Domodedovo Airport will have the edge with travelers, vendors and airlines. It is simply more responsive to the needs of the market.

 Privatization of airports is growing. According to Robert W. Poole, Jr. of the Reason Foundation (www. reason.org), “15 major airports were privatized in 2006, the second-highest annual total ever (there were 21 airport privatization deals in 1998).

Despite recent political setbacks, privatizations could continue. Unlike China,  Russia and Ukraine lack sufficient resources to fully modernize their infrastructure.  Privatization or partial privatization remain the most viable options. The investment, technology and management that foreign companies would bring, could go very far in raising the living standard in these emerging economies.  

 Moscow Points the Way With Airport Competition

While Most Nations Sport Monopolies, Rivalry Between Two Russian Gateways Ushers in Improvements for Carriers, Travelers

By DANIEL MICHAELS

MOSCOW — A heated battle for passengers between the Russian capital’s main airports offers an unlikely model of competition for the aviation industry.

In most cities, airports are monopolies. Even in cities that have more than one, including New York, Paris and Tokyo, airports are usually owned by the same operator. That means airlines can rarely make the kind of choices passengers take for granted, such as choosing an airport for its efficiency, shopping or lounges.

Not so in Moscow, where two international airports, Domodedovo and Sheremetyevo, owned by rival organizations, battle for business. The result is lower fees, better service and fast-improving facilities all around.

Domodedovo Airport, for example, recently convinced several top airlines to make it their Russian base, thanks to a major modernization that added more than 20 new restaurants, jewelry boutiques and a shop where passengers can rent DVDs to watch in booths.

Sheremetyevo Airport responded by building a fast rail link to Moscow, complete with a Starbucks at the airport station.

Moscow’s airport rivalry highlights a paradox of the global aviation industry: Airlines compete fiercely with each other for customers, but they face many monopolist suppliers, such as air-traffic control systems, fuel distributors and airports. Resulting costs and poor services get passed on to travelers.

Regulators world-wide are starting to tackle the issue — and some see Moscow as a paradigm.

Britain’s competition authority, for example, last year considered breaking up BAA, the company that runs London’s three big airports. In testimony before the regulator, officials from the International Air Transport Association, a trade group, cited Moscow as evidence of the benefits that competition could bring London’s airport system. IATA testified that fees at Moscow’s fast-growing, privately owned Domodedovo Airport are as much as 20% lower than at Sheremetyevo, the state-owned hub of flag carrier Aeroflot.

The U.K. listened. Bowing to government pressure, BAA’s Spanish ownerFerrovial SA now plans to sell London’s second-biggest airport, Gatwick. British Airways PLC and other big customers are too entrenched at Heathrow to switch to Gatwick, but airlines say competition could prompt airport managers to trim fees and start to resolve problems such as chronic fuel-supply shortages.

“I’d love to have competing airports everywhere in the world,” says Bruno Matheu, executive vice president for marketing at Franco-Dutch carrier Air France-KLM SA, an Aeroflot partner in the SkyTeam airline alliance. Air France-KLM uses Sheremetyevo in Moscow.

Moscow’s airport market didn’t develop overnight.

Until recently, few big airports world-wide were worse than Sheremetyevo, the Soviet Union’s international gateway, built for the 1980 Olympics. Checking in for a flight could take hours. So could driving jammed roads to the airport, which lacked rail connection.

During Russia’s privatization drive of the 1990s, local investors bought Domodedovo, which was previously Moscow’s airport serving Soviet Central Asia. The investors, grouped into an upstart charter-airline operator, East Line Group, renovated a terminal at Domodedovo and oversaw construction of a train line to Moscow.

East Line charged airlines landing and operating fees that undercut Sheremetyevo by around 30%. For passengers, Domodedovo’s rail link guaranteed a 40-minute trip to downtown Moscow. Private Russian carriers, largely frozen out of Aeroflot’s base at Sheremetyevo, expanded quickly at the spacious Domodedovo.

East Line’s big break came in 2003, when British Airways announced it would switch from Sheremetyevo to Domodedovo.

“The authorities were shocked that a major airline would leave the government airport,” recalls Daniel Burkard, BA’s former country manager for Russia. He says a big factor was that East Line offered a big business-class lounge.

Mr. Burkard, a 41-year-old German, says he was so impressed by Domodedovo’s management that when his BA contract in Moscow ended in 2005, he joined East Line as its business development manager and started wooing other airlines to Domodedovo.

He promoted the airport’s many domestic airlines, which allow foreign carriers to reach small cities across the former Soviet Union, and in 2005 catapulted Domodedovo over Sheremetyevo as Moscow’s biggest airport in terms of passenger traffic. Other attractions include a children’s area staffed with nurses, fast immigration lines for Westerners, and competing vending machines, operated by rival suppliers.

In 2006 Mr. Burkard convinced up-market Austrian Airlines AG to switch from Sheremetyevo. The move prompted other carriers in the Star Alliance to rethink their choice in Moscow. Last year Deutsche Lufthansa AG, one of the biggest foreign carriers in Russia, also made the jump.

When AMR Corp.’s American Airlines decided last year to enter the Moscow market, managers visited both international airports. They were impressed by Domodedovo.

The airport’s executives “were a bit more aware of how we do business,” says Craig Kreeger, American’s senior vice president for international operations. Since flights began this June, Mr. Kreeger says, Domodedovo has fulfilled its commitments better than many airports in more developed markets.

Over the past three years, 28 carriers have either shifted to Domodedovo or started new Moscow service there.

Domodedovo’s success brought it unwanted attention, however. During Vladimir Putin’s recent presidency, many of Russia’s 1990s privatizations were reversed.

At East Line, government security officials repeatedly searched facilities and confiscated property. Government lawsuits against East Line yielded court rulings that threatened the company’s control of the airport. The Kremlin’s objective wasn’t clear, but appeared to be related to battles between powerful clans for control over the lucrative airport business, according to people close to the conflict. Recent appeals-court decisions supporting East Line seem to have ended the problem, although political shifts might prompt new challenges.

Two years ago, Sheremetyevo started to fight back, as a new management team began redeveloping the airport. In June, Sheremetyevo got a 30-minute rail link to Moscow. One new terminal recently opened and two more are slated for completion by 2010. In the old terminal, workers are now repainting brown walls white, modernizing check-in desks and installing more shops.

Anton Olff

 

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Future of Marketing

Saturday, November 29th, 2008

If you want to peer into the future of marketing and advertising, then this article in the U.S. edition of the Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com) is the vehicle. Although it could be construed that it only reflects a snapshot from an American perspective, the odds are that these modes will be replicated…or perhaps even improved…in emerging markets.

As internet access-particularly broadband-becomes more widespread in Russia, Ukraine for example, then additional avenues for reaching and informing consumers will increase.

Marketing in the World of the Web

Bemes, clouds and MySpace: Welcome to the brave new world of retail.

By TOM HAYES and MICHAEL S. MALONE

Retailers will eventually recover from the consumption tailspin that threatens this holiday season. But quite apart from the recession, there are other, profound changes underway in the retail sector. As the evidence mounts about the power of social networks to reconfigure individual behavior, the crucial question facing industry is: How to leverage this phenomenon into actual profits?

The second generation of Internet (”Web 2.0″) companies such as MySpace, Facebook, Linked/In and YouTube exploded upon the scene three years ago. Today, MySpace and Facebook together have more users than the entire U.S. population; and the online community concept is already becoming a powerful tool for everything from creating customer loyalty, to assistance in product design, to a sounding board for company strategy.

Corporations from IBM to Toyota and Johnson & Johnson have been rushing to establish their own affiliated social networks and bind their customers ever more closely. There isn’t a smart company today that isn’t implementing some kind of online community, wiki or blog strategy.

But companies with millions of members of online communities are now asking: What next? How do we sell them products and services, or mobilize them into massive de facto R&D, manufacturing and sales departments? We have been studying the challenge and have concluded that very few of the traditional techniques of classical marketing (call them Marketing 1.0), or even of eCommerce (Marketing 2.0) will work in the world of social networks. A very different set of tools, concepts and practices is needed. Call it Marketing 3.0. Here are five:

- From loyalty to attention. Before you can win consumer loyalty, you have to capture and reward consumer attention. Old propositions — network television’s tired offer of 22 minutes of canned sitcoms in exchange for eight minutes of untargeted commercials — won’t cut it. Consumers are demanding a better deal.

Some brands are starting to flirt with better exchange rates: Virgin Mobile gives a minute of free phone time for every minute of advertising a customer accepts. Ryan Air recently announced it would offer $15 coach tickets from the U.S. to Europe, subsidized by passenger attention to advertising and in-flight sales pitches.

Smart marketers will of necessity become obsessed with customer attention in the way they once obsessed over customer loyalty. The shrewd brands will create elaborate attention-rewards programs, and incentives to break through the noise and make that critical initial connection.

- From crowds to clouds. Once you get that attention — once you generate heavy traffic to your site, gather a large league of “friends” on MySpace, or spawn a dedicated following on Twitter — how do you monetize the crowd?

Smart brands are turning their crowds into “clouds”: organic, self-forming and often self-governing communities of interest. Companies such as Hewlett-Packard, Frito-Lay and Harley-Davidson use their clouds as feedback loops to get better faster by obtaining good, timely, often brutally honest customer insights. And the members of clouds can become true believers; they don’t just watch your commercials, they make them.

Right now, few companies are emotionally equipped to wring the best benefits of a cloud, because the most valuable voices out there usually belong to the malcontents. In the old model, customer-service departments aimed to placate or jettison disgruntled customers. In the cloud model, the idea is to cultivate and reward them. That’s not an easy transition.

- From places to spaces. Consumers are increasingly organizing themselves into new communities — not just the big generic social communities, but myriad idiosyncratic slices of narrow, passionate interest (i.e., BlackPlanet, Inpowr and MomsCafe).

These new market spaces, or “meganiches,” may seem small, even strange at first. But when they’re efficiently targeted, they can be highly responsive, lucrative and loyal. Well-established meganiche Web sites include Gamefaq.com for video gamers, Dpreview.com for digital photography aficionados, and Howardchui.com dedicated to mobile phone zealots.

With this shift toward self-organization by consumers, national advertising campaigns as we know them will increasingly become a waste of time and money for many companies. The trick for brands is to cohabit social spaces with these consumers. Social media, and its verb form, “friending,” requires entirely new forms of advertising: bottom up instead of top down, personal rather than public, and subtle rather than full frontal.

- From memes to bemes. In the Age of Broadcast, good advertising could occasionally manufacture memes of tremendous social impact. Think of “Where’s the Beef?” or “I can’t believe I ate the whole thing.” If you can’t recall an irresistible or effective turn of phrase of late, it’s because it is exceedingly difficult to spread a meme in today’s fragmented media environment. Marketing 3.0 is now the science of devising and managing directed business memes: call them bemes. Bemes are sent by members of social communities to each other and typically contain a reward or exclusive offer, which, when redeemed, also results in a reward coupon for the sender. This encourages members of social communities to propagate a “viral” ad. One well-documented beme was “The Subservient Chicken” from Burger King.

Brute force marketing won’t work inside social networks. The best online marketing now takes place among people who know and trust each other. Consider how rumors work. Like a rumor, a beme is a bit of useful information that rewards each person who passes it along. Want to be a sensation? Create a beme that consumers willingly accept and share with others.

- From silos to simultaneity. Too many retailers today persist in believing that online shopping is merely a virtual extension of real world shopping. That is a big mistake.

Rather, online and offline need to coexist, and we need to rethink how they relate. For example, to their surprise, companies like BestBuy (which even encourages customers to shop the aisles but buy online from in-store kiosks) and Macy’s are discovering that physical retailing is a perfect way to move units online. That is, the physical world has become the showroom for the virtual realm.

Retailers now must reimagine a world where consumers experience products in stores but ultimately buy them on the Web: Stores are for experiences, the network is for inventories. And what in turn prepares potential customers for what to look for in stores? Online communities.

All of this suggests that Marketing 3.0 is not only different from its predecessors, but actively undermines them. If your marketing program fails to adapt to this new world, it won’t just become irrelevant — it will actually work against you.

Anton Olff

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Hold the Imports!!

Friday, November 28th, 2008

Spoke with a good friend a few days ago whom is a customs broker here in Odessa.  She stated that business overall has declined precipitously over the last several months. She emphasized that container traffic at the busiest port of Ukraine has slowed to a trickle. This is borne out by anecdotes of others we have contacted whom are connected with trade and logistics services. 

Here is a story from www.kommersant.com regarding wine imports and Russia.  It is a fair indication of the reduction of trade worldwide. 

Import Wine Piled Up at Customs Warehouses

“The global financial turmoil has broken up preparation for New Year festivities. Thousands of unpaid bottles are still at the customs terminals, while the supplies shed 2.5 fold to 3 fold on year in October and November. But the analysts foresee no shortage, as the demand for alcohol is going down as well. 

The importers don’t take wine from the customs storage facilities, confirmed Artur Baranovsky, who is the director of DNT terminal in Latvia that annually handles over 1,000 vans with wine imported to Russia. Each van carries 16,000 bottles. His words echoed Alexander Arbuzov, head of the Moscow terminal in Solntsevo that services wine supplies from CIS.

Baranovsky said the usual practice is that the terminal’s handling surges 2.5 fold to 3 fold in October and November on supplies timed to New Year festivities. This year, however, the turnover matches the summer indicators, which traditionally suffer from the import decline. 

According to Federal Customs Service, some 207 million liters of wine were delivered to Russia in January through October. Russia produced 430 million liters over the period, according to official statistics. Even the cheapest import wine costs 1.5 fold to 2 fold more than the wine of local make, so the market shares are relatively equal in terms of money. 

The wine imports shed to 20.4 million liters in October from 21.3 million liters in September, showed the data of Federal Customs Service. But the trend was quite the opposite past year, when the supplies grew by October, up to to 20.1 million liters vs the 18.8 million liters imported in September. 

Nowadays, however, even big importers slashed the supplies by 1.5 fold to 2.5 fold. The imports of Moro, for instance, lowered from 2.9 million liters to 2.5 million liters. What’s more, the importers not only tend to order fewer new brands but they even return the already paid ones, abandoning the planned future supplies”

Anton Olff

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Economic Forecast and the Weather

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

Economics has often been called the “dismal science.”  Having known many economists in my past life working as a wage slave in the corporate world, I can say that it was not the “science” that was necessarily dismal, but the practitioners. This is especially true these days. The same economists that were saying “the fundamentals” of the Global Economy were sound 6 months ago, are now in the doom and gloom mode. In  other words, it is not going to just rain…but rain for 40 days and 40 nights!! 

A person of means and resources might want to start building an ark…or maybe just buy gold bullion and store it in a bank vault in Switzerland…but the rest of us will have to learn to swim in some very deep water (or in sewage) if the deluge comes.

The Nostradamuses of our age…Gerald Celente for example, is predicting Depression II, another American Revolution with widespread tax riots in the United States by 2012. Certainly, it is a possibilty given the recent riots in Iceland. However, those of us with a eye for opportunities (entrepreneurs, shameless exploiters and capitalists) know that would be an excellent time to own a factory making Ronald Reagan AND Che Guevara t-shirts. 

….and what is the current forecast? Well…it depends on whom you ask. Most of the data out there suggests that the economies of the developed world will not be growing at all…but NOT the emerging market economies. According to the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Russia is projected to grow at over 3% versus the 7.3% it had been prior to the Global Meltdown (and declining oil prices).  Indeed, most of Eastern and Central Europe will see positive net growth. Whatever the forecast, there will be a lot of pain…but also a lot of long term opportunities.

Bring an umbrella. However, make sure to turn it upside down on occasion as it could be raining “pennies from heaven”

Anton Olff

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Mortgages in Transistion Economies

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

An in-depth and insightful look at the mortgage market in emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe (including Russia & Ukraine),  as well as Central Asia by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).  

In pdf format..a must read for anyone currently investing in real estate or securities in these markets or considering future investment. 

http://ebrd.com/pubs/legal/mit.htm

NOTE: The MBS referred to in this report are Mortgage Backed Securities and not MBS, Ltd. 


Anton Olff

Recessionary Marketing

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

As I wrote on 24 November 2008, the recession in emerging markets provides opportunities for companies to promote, establish, re-establish, and capture market share. The key is looking beyond the short term-which is painful for almost everyone at this moment- and focus on the long haul.

John Rose writes today in “The Moscow Times:” The looming crisis in Russia will cause many marketers to re-evaluate budgets, strategies and relationships. Although there may be many challenges ahead for companies as they face the prospect of slower growth and pressure on margins, there is a silver lining in that black cloud. During the last financial crisis in Russia, a decade ago, some companies took advantage of falling media costs and slow-to-react competition to capture market share and set the stage for strong future earnings.

There are three main opportunities for marketing during a recession.

Opportunity No. 1: Customers generally re-evaluate their brand loyalties during a recession. It is no longer business as usual. Many people will be looking for greater value as their buying power weakens. A recession breaks down barriers that make consumers otherwise resistant to new brand messages. This creates an opportunity for brands that have otherwise been unable to capture significant market share in a crowded category or one dominated by a larger competitor. If you are the No. 2, 3 or 4 brand in your market category and you have a good story to tell, this could be your best opportunity in years to relate your story and receive a positive reception. Reacting to the last financial crisis, Mobile TeleSystems continued advertising, while its competitor Beeline retreated. As a result, MTS substantially raised its subscriber base and overtook, Beeline, to become the top Russian mobile service provider. And MTS still retains the No. 1 spot today, despite Beeline’s ubiquitous advertising campaign.

 
 

Opportunity No. 2: Many companies will take a wait-and-see attitude during a recession. They will freeze or cut marketing budgets until they have a clearer picture of what lies ahead. This will have the effect of reducing media costs. The smart companies will become more aggressive while their competitors have their heads in the sand, and they can get more for their marketing expenditures. Now is the time to be creative and grab some attention for your company and brand. Establish yourself as a leader by staying visible through the media, promotion and public relations. Show the world you have a resilient brand and a plan for a sustainable future. Experience shows that market share gained during a recession will return dividends when the economy rebounds. Wimm-Bill-Dann continued to promote and expand aggressively during the last crisis, filling a vacuum left by international competitors, who were still licking their wounds. Today, they are the leading Russian producer of dairy and beverage products. Saint Springs is another example of a company that continued to expand its marketing programs while the market was still contracting. After becoming the leader in the bottled water segment, it was acquired by Nestle Waters in 2002.

Opportunity No. 3: Customers expect a deal during a recession. People know companies are under pressure and will expect them to react to the recession with superior products, special offers and better service to win their business or get them to buy. You don’t want to disappoint them. But unless you run a volume business where you plan to always be the price leader, you shouldn’t feel obliged to lower your prices to win business during a recession. Sure, discounts will move inventory today, but it may come at a high cost in the future through the loss of brand value. The key is to give your customers more rather than charge them less. Value is most important, not price. Expand product features, extend warranties, provide special financing terms and offer enticing rewards for becoming loyal to your superior brand. Electronics retailer M-Video owes much of its success to creative promotions it began during the last crisis to lure customers and build loyalty, which is a practice they continue to this day. Currently, together with Sony Ericsson, they are giving away a card that provides free cinema tickets for one year when you buy select mobile phones. Their customers will be escaping the Russian recession to Hollywood — at least in their imaginations — and will no doubt reward the company with loyalty and future purchases.

It’s easier, of course, to follow the market and do what the other guys are doing during a crisis — that is, very little. But with a better understanding of the short window of opportunity brought on by a crisis — plus a little chutzpah — your company could use this recession to build a stronger brand and a more profitable business in the near future, when Russia bounces back.

Anton Olff


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,