A few weeks ago, two of my business partners and I traveled by car from Odessa to Western Ukraine. On our way back to Odessa, we decided to stop and see Hitler’s wartime bunker in Vinnitsa, about 150km west of the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv. We had heard that it was more like a Roman ruins, and we were not surprised that there wasn’t much to see in terms of a structure that one could easily identify as a bunker.

What we found were bits and pieces of reinforced concrete in the area, scattered about since the bunker and the surrounding above ground structures were bombed. The actual bunker-called Werewolf-is sealed off. Recently, a team of Russian engineers surveyed it and proclaimed that it is unsafe and cannot be opened to the public since it was mined by retreating Germans. Apparently, live munitions remain in place, though this could be just a canard to keep the curious as well as neo-Nazis out.

The area where the bunker was built looks similar to an alpine forest in Germany. The bunker and barracks complex-which housed an army of SS- was easily concealed from aerial views by the woods. The surrounding fields-beautiful spans of Ukrainian farmland-were ideal for massing tanks and aircraft.

Hitler was transported by air to this command post.  From this vantage point, he directed Operation Barbarossa…the invasion of the Soviet Union…and watched his evil fantasy of “Lebensraum” unfold. Living space for Germans in the vastness of Ukraine and Russia was never realized, though the deaths of millions of Jews and Slavs unfortunately was.

One of the strangest aspects about visiting Hitler’s Bunker, is seeing what it has become: a Ukrainian National Park (see photo of sign below), where families stroll with their young children and couples congregate. Although it is a picturesque area, it is difficult to comprehend why Ukrainians would want to be there, other than to appreciate it’s historical significance. One would think that the death of millions of Ukrainians and Russians at the hands of Nazis who built this bunker for their beloved Fuhrer, would weigh on the minds of those spreading their picnic blankets about.

On the other hand, perhaps a park is a way of turning a negative into a positive? I however, found another form of expression. Before I departed the area where the most physical evidence of the Nazi invasion persists-a large piece of concrete from the bunker structure-I relieved myself on the remains of this edifice. Pissing on Hitler’s Bunker was my way of turning a “negative” into a “positive.” Maybe the grass will grow a little a little greener as a result?

…and coincidentally, just as I was finished “watering” an area where the Fuhrer might have walked more than six decades ago, a friend of mine in Odessa called me. Since my business partner wanted to hear as well, I put the call on speakerphone. The caller was walking through the center of Odessa where many street musicians play for small change and the music was now being broadcast over a good portion of the bunker area…excuse me; Ukrainian National Park. At that very moment, a familar piece of music was now echoing out: Hava Nagila.

Hearing Jewish folk music waft across a graveyard of Hitler’s dreams: perfect!!

The economic policies described below should do wonders for the Russian economy.  Sarcasm aside, Putin’s well intentioned (whatever one thinks of Putin, he believes he is a Russian patriot) restrictions-like all protectionist policies designed to help domestic industry-will backfire as the productivity that technology provides will not be available. That will be the effect of tariffs.

It is no surprise that xenophobic Russia employs protectionism. This fits into a historical pattern of encouraging development periodically, and then squashing it just as it bears fruit. A vast nation like Russia with an incredible array of resources should be the richest nation in the World, but protectionist and other anti-growth policies keep it underdeveloped. The excuse of protecting domestic companies and jobs is always used, though an examination of nations that allow competition shows that it increases wealth, tax revenues, and creates a greater numbers of jobs.

Our hope is that Ukraine does not adopt these restrictions. Given the cultural similarities between Russia and Ukraine, as well as the shared oligarchic influences in both governments, we would not be at all surprised if Ukraine went down the same road. It would be even more damaging to Ukraine since it does not have the same resources of Russia and must rely more on the industrial, service and consumer sectors of the economy.

 Restrictions and tariffs on farm equipment and machinery in a nation sitting on an under-utilized agricultural sector with the best farm land in the World, would damage a nation that has already suffered through ill conceived socialist collectivization decades ago.

Putin’s Tariffs Stall Russian Growth for Caterpillar

By Melita Marie Garza and Paul Abelsky

April 20 (Bloomberg) — Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s trade measures are starting to keep Deere & Co. combines and Caterpillar Inc. trucks out of Russian wheat fields and coal mines, dimming the companies’ prospects for expansion abroad.

Deere and Caterpillar, reeling from the longest U.S. recession in a quarter century, were the companies most affected by loan restrictions and tariffs of as much as 25 percent that Putin imposed this year, according to a U.S. Chamber of Commerce survey of the top 50 American businesses operating in Russia.

Putin is trying to boost Russian industries with tariffs on everything from drugs to farm equipment as declining oil revenue saps the nation’s economy. The policies are hurting sales by Caterpillar, Deere and Agco Corp. in a market where revenue was forecast to rise as much as sixfold in the next decade.

“The new tariffs kicked these guys in the knees when they were down,” Larry De Maria, a New York-based analyst with Sterne, Agee & Leach Inc., said in a telephone interview. “Russia was supposed to be a $3 billion market in 2008 with potential to grow to $20 billion, possibly in as little as a decade.”

Emerging-market sales likely fell so far this year for Deere and Caterpillar, which reports first-quarter earnings tomorrow, De Maria said. Caterpillar is expected to report profit excluding certain items of 5 cents a share, the average estimate of 20 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. The company earned $1.45 a share a year earlier.

“We are really going to struggle this year in Russia,” Ken Harding, Caterpillar’s regional execution manager for the Commonwealth of Independent States, said in a telephone interview.

‘Low’ Expectations

Caterpillar’s “expectation is low” that it will sell any of its 60-ton trucks, used for quarry and construction work, in Russia this year after selling eight last year, Harding said.

Starting in January, Peoria, Illinois-based Caterpillar and other foreign makers of off-highway trucks faced duties of 25 percent, an increase from 5 percent last year. BelAZ, a Belarusian equipment producer that dominates the region’s truck industry, isn’t subject to the tariff and will benefit, Harding said.

Caterpillar declined 59 percent on the New York Stock Exchange in the 12 months through April 17. Deere fell 56 percent, and Agco dropped 64 percent.

Deere, the world’s largest maker of agricultural equipment, and Duluth, Georgia-based Agco are being hurt by a program that gives Russian farmers a 20 percent discount on loans from Russia’s Central Bank if they buy domestic machines.

Loan Program

The deal is for loans made through OAO Sberbank, Russia’s largest lender, and Rosselkhozbank, the Russian Agricultural Bank, which both have local offices that farmers rely on for financing, Michael Considine, director of EurAsia issues for the Washington-based Chamber of Commerce, said in an interview.

“If a Russian farmer had the cash to buy a Deere combine, it would cost substantially more because of the tariff increase,” Considine said. “And if you didn’t have the money, you could just forget about it because you’d only be able to get the money to buy something made in Russia.”

Putin undertook the measures after a December visit to Rostov, Russia-based Rostselmash, the country’s leading combine maker.

Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov wasn’t available for comment. Valeriy Khromthenkov, a Russian official in Washington with oversight of agricultural issues, declined to comment. A spokesman for Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin, who also is deputy prime minister, wasn’t available to comment.

‘Dramatically Reduced’

Agco’s sales are “dramatically reduced” in the region, because borrowing for a foreign tractor is now almost impossible, Greg Peterson, Agco’s head of investor relations, said in a telephone interview.

In its first-quarter earnings announcement in February, Moline, Illinois-based Deere said sales will decline in Central Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States for the year. Ken Golden, a spokesman for Deere, declined to comment.

“Our main problems have been the lack of state subsidies on loans combined with insufficient operating cash and the general economic downturn, not the import tariffs,” Alexander Altynov, the general director of AgroSnab, an official John Deere dealer in Russia, said in a telephone interview.

Market Decline

Altynov predicted the foreign machinery market in Russia will decline as much as 75 percent this year.

Deere was expected to post second-quarter profit excluding certain items of $1.08 a share, the average estimate of 17 analysts in a Bloomberg survey.

The U.S. Trade Representative has worked with the U.S. combine harvester industry and at a meeting in Moscow in March expressed concern about the tariff, Nefeterius McPherson, a spokeswoman for the trade representative, said in an e-mail.

The tariff runs counter to Russia’s G20 pledge to avoid protectionist measures and is contrary to a November 2006 bilateral agreement that Russia will maintain a 5 percent tariff on combines until it joins the World Trade Organization, McPherson said.

The ruble’s 31 percent decline against the dollar since July also has made foreign products more expensive. Russia’s Economy Ministry estimates that imports have tumbled more than 30 percent in the first quarter of this year.

Last month, Russia allocated 25 billion rubles ($746.7 million) to OAO Rosagroleasing, the nation’s largest farm- equipment leasing company, and 45 billion rubles to state-run Rosselkhozbank as part of a 3 trillion-ruble stimulus package.

Rosagroleasing spent the money on Russian-made equipment, including 5 billion rubles on OAO KamAZ trucks, Agriculture Minister Yelena Skrynnik told Putin during a meeting on April 17, according to a transcript on the government’s Web site.

Farm Equipment

Russia’s Union of Farm-Equipment Producers, known as Soyuzagromash, asked the government last week to extend the 15 percent import duty on combines to all farm equipment. The tariffs may boost domestic market share for farm machines to 60 percent, the union said.

“The government wants both to help the domestic producers and keep the state funds allocated to the agricultural sector inside Russia,” said Mikhail Pak, an analyst with IFC Metropol in Moscow.

Putin’s efforts may hurt U.S. companies’ operations in the rest of the world, said De Maria, of Sterne Agee.

“There is a worry that these measures could spread to China and other emerging-market countries,” De Maria said. That “would be a blow to the Deere brand and others, stifling their growth strategy as local companies build share.”

(from www.bloomberg.com)

“We must be a non-aligned state. We have to learn to live independently,” he said at a meeting with citizens of the town of Hadiach in Poltava region on Tuesday.

According to the head of the parliament, the question of whether Ukraine should join NATO or not NATO could be a source of conflict in the country.

The position of the people must be taken into account, and most of them oppose Ukraine’s joining NATO, Lytvyn added.

At the same time, he noted that the question on Ukraine’s joining the North Atlantic alliance is not a primary issue now.

(from Interfax)

The World Bank has also revised their economic outlook for Ukraine…and it is not very positive.

“Ukraine’s faltering economy will plunge into a deep recession and shrink by 9 percent this year, far worse than previously expected, according to the World Bank”

After nearly a decade of robust growth, the economy is being hit hard by the deterioration of the global economy and the national government’s failure to implement anti-crisis measures, the Bank said in a statement.

Inflation will hit 16.4 percent this year, better than last year’s 22.3 percent but still very high.

In December, the Bank had forecast that Ukraine’s economy would shrink by 4 percent and projected inflation at 13.6 percent. The International Monetary Fund expects the economy to contract by at least 6 percent this year.

Those estimates contradict sharply with government expectations of 0.4 percent growth and 9.5 inflation this year, which many analysts dismiss as unrealistic.

Ukraine’s economic crisis is one of the worst in Europe. Industrial output slumped by 32 percent in January and February compared with a year ago, and output in the construction industry dropped by 57 percent during that period, according to the World Bank.

The national currency, the hryvna, has lost about 40 percent of its value to the dollar since the crisis hit last fall.

Furthermore, constant political turmoil has worsened the effect of the global crisis on Ukraine by stalling the implementation of key anti-crisis policies.

The IMF withheld the second tranche of an emergency $16.4 billion loan this year after the government failed to trim spending and adopt other stabilization measures.

(from AP)

The tension between Europe and Ukraine is increasing on another front. This article at www.unian.net seems to confirm some of the rumours swirling about; Ukraine is threatening to end the visa free regime that Europeans enjoyed over the last several years.  No word on how or if this will affect citizens of the United States or the U.K.

Several years ago, Ukraine broke with the cumbersome and expensive Soviet visa scheme still practiced in Russia. This has brought a small but measurable wave of investment, new business and tourism into Ukraine.

It has certainly made it easier for entrepreneurs to work and develop new businesses here. The continuation would certainly go a long way towards increasing further investment when the global economic crisis eases, and will facilitate an even greater transfer of wealth from West to East.

Many companies in Europe will relocate their manufacturing in the next decade. A positive atmosphere as evidenced by a visa free regime, would help with this process just as a streamlined visa process did in China during the 1990s. This does not take into account the agricultural sector which will see a flood of Euro investment when laws regarding the sale and leasing of land change.

As expats who look towards the future with optimism and hope for even more business and opportunities, let’s hope that this latest threat is merely a negotiation ploy designed to get the attention of bureaucrats in Brussels.

The Ukrainian government is certainly correct about the lack of reciprocity from the EU in terms of visa issues as well as immigration. The EU continues to treat Ukraine more as a threat than as an asset and until this mentality changes within the councils of Europe, Ukraine will have to swallow some pride, be tough and creative with regards to policy, and walk the “tightrope” between the EU and Ukraine’s powerful neighbor to the East.

Ukraine considers re-introducing visas for Europeans soon - official

Kiev, Apr 04, 2009 (BBC Monitoring via COMTEX) – 

Visa-free travels between Ukraine and Europe will be cancelled soon, maybe even before 7 May, the deputy head of the presidential secretariat, representative of the president [Viktor Yushchenko] in the Supreme Council [parliament], Ihor Popov, said in an interview with the Radio Liberty on Saturday [4 April].

“We will cancel visa-free regime with Europe soon and we will benefit from this. This will happen very soon, maybe even before the summit in Prague on 7 May 2009,” Popov said.

He said that “law-enforcement agencies complain that since Europeans come to Ukraine without visas, every three months police catch some kind of a ‘paedophile’ or a ‘maniac’”.

“Entering Ukraine, a foreigner shows a passport on the border, 10 seconds and off he goes. Later it appears that the man should not have been let in. As a result, he is put on the national wanted list since he entered without a visa and is not registered in the database,” Popov said.

Popov also said that this action can “push Europeans to cancellation of visas for us”.

Source: UNIAN news agency, Kiev, in Ukrainian 1843 gmt 4 Apr 09

There is a mad scramble for capital now. People are looking for loans from banks. The banks are looking for loans from governments. Governments are looking for loans from each other and eventually governments will have to get the money from their citizens…

Eastern Europe has been especially hard hit. It will interesting to see if nations in the European Union-who have the largest share of foreign investment in Eastern European emerging markets-will come to the rescue. With limited resources, and their own credit and banking problems, European nations are going to have a bit of trouble loaning to Eastern Europeans, especially when their own populations are also suffering.

If the situation in Eastern and Central Europe worsens however-and that is the expectation at this point-then Western Europe could be forced to help since the geo-political repercussions would be quite negative.

this from the Associated Press:

Ukraine seeks euro500 mln from EBRD

Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko on Wednesday met with the chief of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development amid efforts to secure a euro500 million investment package to rescue this ex-Soviet republic`s devastated economy, AP reported.

The bank is considering investing the money into recapitalizing some Ukrainian banks, shaken by the global credit crunch and a confidence crisis. Three Ukrainian banks have been put in receivership and another one has been sold to a Russian institution after being taken over by the central bank.

The economy is struggling to stay afloat after the International Monetary Fund withheld a key second tranche of a $16.4 loan over a failure to meet loan obligations earlier this month, prompting Kiev to turn to G-7 members and Russia for aid.

The loan problems led the international rating agency Fitch to downgrade Ukraine`s ratings, while another agency, Standard and Poor`s, threatened a similar move.

The IMF said Ukraine had failed to cut government spending and reconsidering this year`s budget, as had been agreed on. Finance Minister Viktor Pynzenyk resigned last week in a row with Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko over the same concerns.

Yushchenko told EBRD President Thomas Mirow that a failure to receive the expected $12 bln in aid from the IMF this year could severely hurt the economy and that is why Ukraine was turning to the EBRD for help.

“The situation is complicated,” Yushchenko told Mirow, according to the Interfax news agency.

Industrial output slumped by a staggering 34.1 percent in January, year-over-year, in what officials said was the biggest fall in the country`s history.

The national currency, the hryvna, has lost 40 percent of its value since last fall, due to a drastic fall in exports.

The crisis, coupled with a higher gas bill from Russia has also led to gas shortages in the eastern city of Dnipropetrovsk and the southern Crimea peninsula. Officials said, however, that hot water and heating supplies had been restored in most households in those regions by Wednesday morning.

Technorati Tags: capital, loans, Europe, Ukraine, Russia, Anton Olff, MBS Ltd., Eastern Europe, Central Europe, Associated Press, President Viktor Yushchenko, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, EBRD, Soviet Union, recapitalization, global credit crunch, International Monetary Fund, Kiev, G-7, Fitch, Standard & Poors, Yulia Tymoshenko, Viktor Pynzenyk, Thomas Mirow, industrial ouput, hryvna, exports, gas shortages, Dnipropetrovsk, Crimea

I don’t agree entirely with this article from russiaprofile.org, though I think the author does make some very valid points applicable to both Russia and Ukraine.

The current economic crisis has caused a great deal of hardship and uncertainly for which the respective governments of Russia and Ukraine seem ill equiped to deal with.  The real question will be how people cope? What will they do in the absence of effective actions by their governments?

Revolution is no stranger in Russian history, nor for Ukrainians. However, apathy is also ingrained to a fair degree in the culture as well. Without a fully developed political structure or the means to redress problems, it may only be a matter of how bad things get before apathy is replaced by outrage.

The same could also apply to Europe as the protests in orderly, peaceful Iceland indicate. Indeed the United States may not be immune to radical change if the political process fails to bring about relief.

The soaring rhetoric of newly elected President Obama is already at odds with some of his actions…as the words spoken by Ukrainian leaders during the Orange Revolution days were not matched by deeds.  Apathy may wither rather quickly and replaced with a fervor that will be difficult to supress.

Technorati Tags: apathy, Russia, Ukraine, MBS Ltd., Anton Olff, economic crisis, revolution, protest, culture, Europe, President Obama, Orange Revolution, Shaun Walker, russiaprofile.org, Russian industry, Magnet Mountain, Stephen Kotkin, Magnitogorsk, Soviet Union, monogorod, Urals, Uralasbest, Asbest, asbestos, Vladimir Putin, President Medvedev, Gary Kasparov, The Independent

Although there may be gloating on the part of some Russians regarding the fate of their neighbors in Ukraine, this article from Russia Today (ww.russiatoday.com) does reflect the reality here.

As the Ukrainian government goes begging for loans around the World with the IMF holding  back on the next tranche of a promised loan, the hryvnia experiencing new lows daily, and workers being laid off throughout Ukraine, the “crisis” is certainly getting worse. The political stalemate is adding to the pain.

Workers suffer under deepening economic crisis in Ukraine

The economic crisis in Ukraine is escalating, and while the government is pointing fingers at each other, social unrest is growing as people lose their jobs or remain unpaid for months.

The crisis is most visible in the Ukrainian city of Kherson, where more than a thousand workers at a combine harvester factory have not received any wages since September.

“They were forcing us to retire. But I didn’t. Where else do we have to go? It’s the same thing everywhere,” said one disgruntled factory worker.

The average salary here is around $US 200, which is barely enough to make ends meet as prices in Ukraine are growing rapidly.

Aleksandra Tkachenko works at the factory and says that she lives in the fear that tomorrow she’ll have nothing left to be able to feed her family. Her entire family now lives off the pension of Aleksandra’s husband, which is less than $US 100 a month.

Recently, her husband suffered a brain hemorrhage and the strain is taking its toll.

“You can’t imagine what a life we life. I’ve spent half of the pension on medicine for my husband, but that won’t even last till the end of the month,” says Tkachenko.

The owners of the factory say they can’t pay the salaries because the combine harvesters are not being sold. The situation in Kherson is one of the first explosions of public rage in Ukraine over the current economic crisis. Experts claim work at almost all factories and mines in the country is either suspended or under threat.
 
By spring, unemployment is expected to grow by four times, topping almost four million people. The public outcry to the consequences of the economic crisis that is gripping Ukraine is getting louder, as more workers put down their tools to protest. 

Unemployment in Ukraine is soon expected to hit levels not seen since the fall of the Soviet Union. Public opinion indicates that what people want is for the government to stop the infighting and to give them the helping hand they desperately need. The crisis of trust among the country’s political elite isn’t helping the situation either.

The president and the opposition blame the government of Yulia Timoshenko for failing to tackle the crisis, or find the right ways to spend the billions of dollars loaned from the International Monetary fund.

Timoshenko says the government needs more money and fewer obstacles from both the parliament and the president. Her latest move – a request for more loans, including five billion dollars from Russia – has yet again provoked the wrath of the president.

“President Yushchenko says the step undertaken by the government without his knowledge is unacceptable and has obvious signs of corruption,” says Irina Vannikova from the Ukrainian Presidential Administration.

With the president and his government failing to agree upon ways out of the crisis, the country plunges ever deeper into a recession, leaving millions of people without work, and in the fear that they will soon have nothing to put on the table.

OK…it is one thing for Ukraine to send letters begging for money to the USA, the EU, even China…but Russia? What are they thinking in Kyiv? Sure…Russia will loan you the money. They may be running a bit short due to propping up rubles and oligarchs, but they will find some spare cash as they know they will gain considerably from any arrangement.

After all, they promised the Kyrgyz Republic some money too. However, the conditions-regardless of what is officially denied-is that a U.S. base be closed. Imagine what they will demand of Ukraine?

From www.ft.com:

Ukraine pushes for loans to meet shortfall

By Roman Olearchyk in Kiev

Ukraine has appealed for emergency loans from the world’s richest countries to help support its economy, which has been battered by the global financial crisis.

Yulia Tymoshenko, prime minister of Ukraine, said her government had sent letters to the US, Russia, China, Japan and the European Union asking for loans to fill a shortfall in budget revenues for this year.

 “We have already received a positive response from some countries, including Russia,” Ms Tymoshenko said at the Munich Security Conference at the weekend. “Russia is ready to sign such loan agreements.” She did not clarify how much Kiev was seeking to borrow but reports in Ukraine suggested Russia could lend $5bn (€3.9bn, £3.4bn).

Ms Tymoshenko said Ukraine was keen to harmonise relations with Moscow, soured after last month’s gas prices dispute. She insisted Kiev would stick to a western integration agenda that included efforts to join the European Union and Nato.

News that Ukraine was seeking emergency loans amid frozen credit markets comes days after a senior International Monetary Fund delegation warned of “serious problems” brewing in Ukraine’s economy.

The fund delegation ended its one-week visit to Kiev last week but provided no clear signal on whether it would grant further disbursements from a $16.5bn standby facility agreed last year.

Ukraine received a first tranche of $4.5bn last November. Future disbursements depend on the implementation of tough conditions and are needed to keep Ukraine’s currency, the hryvnia, stable. It lost nearly 40 per cent of its value in 2008.

The IMF’s concerns centre on Kiev’s 2009 budget, which has a 3 per cent deficit in spite of a fund stipulation it be deficit-free. It also seeks a freeze on social spending at a time when more than 1m out of a population of 46m have lost their jobs.

Ukraine’s gross domestic product is expected to contract by around 5 per cent this , thus curbing budget revenues, complicating the state’s ability to rescueshaky banks and to provide unemployment benefits.

Ukraine is struggling to tame annual inflation of more than 20 per cent and toadjust to a fourth stiff price rise on natural gas imports from Russia in as manyyears.

The US and other western nations are keen to stabilise Ukraine for geopolitical as well as economic purposes, given its important position in Eastern Europe as a neighbour of Russia.

Technorati Tags: Ukraine, Russia, United States, European Union, China, Kyiv, MBS Ltd., Anton Olff, Kyrgyz Republic, military bases, loans, Roman Olearchyk, global financial crisis, Japan, Munich Security Conference, Yuliya Tymoshenko, Moscow, NATO, International Monetary Fund, hryvnia, gross domestic product, natural gas, geopolitics

From www.reuters.com:

Fitch sees more E.Europe downgrades

Ratings agency Fitch expects more downgrades in emerging Europe after cutting Russia`s rating this week, it said on Thursday, warning political risk was a mounting threat to creditworthiness in the region, Reuters reported.

Head of emerging European sovereigns Edward Parker said that with nine countries in the region on negative outlook and the financial crisis deepening, creditworthiness in a string of countries was deteriorating.

“I would expect that we would see more negative ratings actions,” he told Reuters in a telephone interview.

Parker said deepening economic pain and rising unemployment across the region heightened the risk of political instability and governments failing to take austerity measures out of fear of rising unrest.

“Clearly, there is going to be a rise in political risk,” he said. “Obviously, political shocks by their nature are often unpredictable but as well as that we would be particularly concerned over the risk of governments failing to pursue prudent and responsible policies.”

He would not say which country would likely be next to follow Russia, which on Wednesday suffered its first rating cut from Fitch in a decade on slumping reserves, corporate and banking problems and economic contraction.

But he said Fitch was watching the upcoming review of Ukraine`s International Monetary Fund deal particularly carefully.

Fitch has said previously that any failure of that deal would lead to a further negative move on Ukraine, which has suffered a currency slump and deep recession as its steel industry and banking sector suffered from the global financial crisis.

In contrast, he said that Turkey might be able to survive without an IMF deal with its current rating intact. Turkey has held back from concluding an IMF deal ahead of local elections.

“We would see an IMF deal as a positive development for Turkey,” he said. “But if one was not agreed they might be able to find other financing and it would not alone be enough for negative ratings action.”

Parker said Fitch was continuing to watch Russia closely in the aftermath of its downgrade, with ongoing low oil prices, any further loss of reserves, worsening of corporate balance sheets or difficulty refinancing debt or rising political risk potentially prompting further action.

Both Russia and Kazakhstan have allowed their currencies to depreciate after spending considerable reserves defending them. Parker said those devaluations had been necessary to take into account the drastic fall in oil prices.

With the Baltic states also entering deep recessions, some analysts believe their currencies — either pegged or trading in narrow bands — might also be forced to devalue.

Parker said this would potentially be negative for their ratings.

“It would make it more difficult for companies and others to repay foreign currency debt and it would undermine balance sheets,” he said.

Currency falls in Central and Eastern Europe were already having a similar effect, he said, with the high proportion of foreign currency loans in Hungary making it more vulnerable than other regional economies such as Poland and the Czech Republic.Technorati

Tags: www.reuters.com, Anton Olff, MBS Ltd., Fitch, Europe, Russia, credit rating, unemployment, austerity, oil reserves, International Monetary Fund, steel industry, Ukraine, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Baltic States, Eastern Europe, Czech Republic