MBS Blog

The tension between Europe and Ukraine is increasing on another front. This article at www.unian.net seems to confirm some of the rumours swirling about; Ukraine is threatening to end the visa free regime that Europeans enjoyed over the last several years.  No word on how or if this will affect citizens of the United States or the U.K.

Several years ago, Ukraine broke with the cumbersome and expensive Soviet visa scheme still practiced in Russia. This has brought a small but measurable wave of investment, new business and tourism into Ukraine.

It has certainly made it easier for entrepreneurs to work and develop new businesses here. The continuation would certainly go a long way towards increasing further investment when the global economic crisis eases, and will facilitate an even greater transfer of wealth from West to East.

Many companies in Europe will relocate their manufacturing in the next decade. A positive atmosphere as evidenced by a visa free regime, would help with this process just as a streamlined visa process did in China during the 1990s. This does not take into account the agricultural sector which will see a flood of Euro investment when laws regarding the sale and leasing of land change.

As expats who look towards the future with optimism and hope for even more business and opportunities, let’s hope that this latest threat is merely a negotiation ploy designed to get the attention of bureaucrats in Brussels.

The Ukrainian government is certainly correct about the lack of reciprocity from the EU in terms of visa issues as well as immigration. The EU continues to treat Ukraine more as a threat than as an asset and until this mentality changes within the councils of Europe, Ukraine will have to swallow some pride, be tough and creative with regards to policy, and walk the “tightrope” between the EU and Ukraine’s powerful neighbor to the East.

Ukraine considers re-introducing visas for Europeans soon - official

Kiev, Apr 04, 2009 (BBC Monitoring via COMTEX) – 

Visa-free travels between Ukraine and Europe will be cancelled soon, maybe even before 7 May, the deputy head of the presidential secretariat, representative of the president [Viktor Yushchenko] in the Supreme Council [parliament], Ihor Popov, said in an interview with the Radio Liberty on Saturday [4 April].

“We will cancel visa-free regime with Europe soon and we will benefit from this. This will happen very soon, maybe even before the summit in Prague on 7 May 2009,” Popov said.

He said that “law-enforcement agencies complain that since Europeans come to Ukraine without visas, every three months police catch some kind of a ‘paedophile’ or a ‘maniac’”.

“Entering Ukraine, a foreigner shows a passport on the border, 10 seconds and off he goes. Later it appears that the man should not have been let in. As a result, he is put on the national wanted list since he entered without a visa and is not registered in the database,” Popov said.

Popov also said that this action can “push Europeans to cancellation of visas for us”.

Source: UNIAN news agency, Kiev, in Ukrainian 1843 gmt 4 Apr 09

This is the right way to close out 2008!! The most tumultuous year in decades was a turning point for everyone in the wake of a global economic tsunami.  As the tide recedes…the doubters, deniers, dreamers and dogmatists some of whom once thought socialism was the way forward, have begun to pillory the very system that has brought the greatest amount of wealth, prosperity and progress to humankind.  Capitalism..or at least what is referred to describe the current system-if that is possible-is again the enemy. 

On the eve of a new year, Caroline Baum writing on www.bloomberg.com , nails the manifesto-however old and tattered- to the public square of the internet for all to see. In the light of examination and reflection, her thesis stands.

Happy New Year from MBS, Ltd!

Capitalism Is Worst System Except for the Rest

Commentary by Caroline Baum

Dec. 30 (Bloomberg) — The year 2008 will be remembered as one that exposed the fatal flaws in free-market capitalism, sending it to an untimely death.

Or will it?

That capitalism’s obituary is already being written suggests the enemies of the free market were waiting to pounce.

Last week, Arianna Huffington, co-founder of the Huffington Post, wrote that laissez-faire capitalism, “a monumental failure in practice,” should be “as dead as Soviet Communism” as an ideology.

On National Public Radio, Daniel Schorr pronounced “the death of a doctrine” in his year-end review.

All I could think of was Winston Churchill’s assertion about democracy. Capitalism is surely the worst economic system, except for all the others that have been tried.

With its ideology under fire and its practice falsely maligned, it is to the defense of free markets that I devote my final column of the year.

Before you can declare free markets a failure, you have to establish that they exist, says Paul Kasriel, chief economist at the Northern Trust Co. in Chicago.

“We do not have free markets in credit in the U.S. or anywhere else that I know of,” he says. “The price of short- term credit is fixed by central banks. It would only be by accident that a central bank would fix the price of short-term credit” at the precise level that a free market would.

Chosen People

Fixing the price of any other commodity, including labor, has proven to be a failure, an affront to the inviolable invisible hand. Yet when it comes to setting the interest rate that will keep the economy on an even keel, we put our faith in a chosen few to get it right.

All sorts of unintended consequences flow forth from central bankers’ fixing of a short-term rate. Hold the rate too low, and it leads to a misallocation of capital into, say, housing or dot- com stocks. That’s what happened in the late 1990s and again in the early part of this decade.

“We are now experiencing the economic and financial market fallout from (Alan) Greenspan’s interference with the free market,” Kasriel says.

In a true free market, risk-takers are punished for bad bets. Not so in the current crisis, where financial institutions — with the exception of Lehman Brothers — are deemed too big to fail and rescued, merged or recapitalized.

Army of Regulators

One supposed nail in capitalism’s coffin is the assertion that deregulation created the problems. This is curious, given that banks, which are at the root of the credit crunch, are among the most highly regulated institutions.

“There is a small army of people overseeing the banking industry,” says Paul DeRosa, a partner at Mt. Lucas Management Corp. in New York. And yet “we’ve had a banking crisis every 15 years since 1837. The number of people devoted to regulation doesn’t seem to matter.”

Regulators from the Federal Reserve, Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Controller of the Currency and New York State Banking Commission are “on the premises 365 days a year,” he says.

The regulatory structure may have been antiquated and overlapping. That’s no excuse for the regulators to be caught napping.

Censuring the free market is a way of deflecting blame from the true source, according to Dan Mitchell, senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute in Washington.

Compromised Overseers

“The genesis of the problem is bad government policy,” Mitchell says, pointing to everything from easy money to “affordable lending schemes” to the “corrupt system of subsidies from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac” to the tax code’s favorable treatment of debt (the interest is deductible) versus equity.

Fannie’s and Freddie’s generous campaign contributions (anywhere else, these would be called bribes) encouraged Congress to look the other way as the two housing finance agencies used their implicit government guarantee to increase their leverage and buy riskier mortgages.

Those clamoring for more regulation as a solution to the current crisis are forgetting that Congress has oversight responsibility for the regulator of those agencies.

“I have no confidence regulation will solve the problem,” says Allan Meltzer, professor of economics at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. “Lawyers and bureaucrats make regulations. Markets figure out how to circumvent the costly ones.”

Imperfect Like Us

As a case in point, Meltzer pointed to the Basel Accords, which “required banks that hold more risky assets to hold more reserves. So they held them off their balance sheet, where they went from being poorly monitored to not monitored at all.”

Capitalism has spread across the globe, lifting millions out of poverty as “a direct consequence of government stepping out of the way,” DeRosa says.

Yet critics of free-market capitalism are implicitly arguing for a bigger role for government.

Alas, government isn’t some benevolent matriarch acting in the public interest, even if it knew what that was. It is a conglomeration of politicians acting in their own self-interest, guided by payoffs from special-interest groups. That’s a poor substitute for the market’s price signals, not to mention a guarantee of inefficiency and waste.

“Capitalism is the only system that produces both growth and freedom,” Meltzer says. Unlike socialism and communism, “it doesn’t depend on someone’s ideas of perfection.”

Yes, markets are guilty of excess, greed, even corruption.

“We’re not perfect people,” Meltzer says. “Capitalism matches mankind.”

Technorati Tags: 2008, turning point, global economic crisis, capitalism, Anton Olff, socialism, MBS Ltd., Caroline Baum, www.bloomberg.com, free markets, Arianna Huffington, Huffington Pos, Soviet Union, Communism, National Public Radio, Daniel Schorr, Winston Churchill, democracy, ideology, Paul Kasriel, Northern Trust Co., Chicago, central banks, short-term credit, commodity, labor, Alan Greenspan, risk takers, Lehman Brothers, deregulation, credit crunch, banking industry, Paul DeRosa, Mt. Lucas Management Corp., New York, Federal Reserve, Securities and Excahnge Commission, Office of the Controller of the Currency, New York State Banking Commission, Dan Mitchell, Cato Institute, Washington D.C., Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, debt, equity, Congress, Allan Meltzer, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, lawyers, bureaucrats, Basel Accords, special interest groups, freedom, greed, corruption, mankind

The last week here in Ukraine has been interesting. Just when you think you have seen or heard it all, you get surprised. Well…the surprise for us here “on the ground” are the depths people will go to convince themselves that things are OK when they know they are not.

I am referring-indirectly-to the real estate market here in Ukraine. While there are new market realities, it seems that the average Ukrainian, and landlords in particular, have not gotten the message. Many still believe that the global economic crisis is happening somewhere else to someone else. Of course, the standard line in Russia and Ukraine is that it is America’s fault.

Even as their friends are fired from jobs, or their own pay is cut or their salary unpaid for the last 3 months, there is a stubborn streak within the Ukrainian soul that does not allow it to acknowledge the obvious. Of course, there is a global economic crisis out there and everyone, everywhere is affected. Wealth, businesses and jobs are disappearing.

As we have noted on this site for the last month, the value of the Ukrainian currency is evaporating quicker than a drop of water in the desert. You would think that would change the perspective of people here.  

When I went to look at a new apartment for myself over the last week, few of the landlords I met with considered negotiating the rents down a bit from pre-crisis bubble prices…even when foreign currency is offered as the form of payment. You would think they would look at the value of the hryvnia shrinking every day and be happy to take a bit less, knowing that they are being paid in a currency that still has some value (for how long Mr. Obama and Mr. Bernanke?).

Of course, the Ukrainian Government is playing the “if you can’t beat them, confuse them” strategy with the currency. A late week intervention by the Government pushed the value of the hryvnia  up quite a bit. Naturally, people took that as a sign that things weren’t that bad after all (those Americans are just spreading gloom and doom!!) so they stopped talking real estate price adjustments, and went shopping. Reports from friends in four Ukrainian cities suggest that the crowded stores I was seeing here in Odessa were no aberration.

Well…the news this morning was that the Prime Minister (the super wealthy blonde with the braid) had accused the President (the formerly handsome one of Orange Revolution fame) of playing currency games so that his cronies could make some money on some contrarian bets. Of course, as soon as the games end the hyrvnia will go back to its original trajectory (it has dropped over 50% since May 2008). Is the IMF watching?

Meanwhile, I am out of the market until after the holidays. I figure once the holidays end, the “hangover” is going to be just the time to talk with people about real estate. In fact, many of businessmen we know are headed here from Europe and the USA, but with investment real estate plans on their minds.

Technorati Tags: Ukraine, currency, hryvnia, Ukrainian Government, President Obama, Prime Minister, President, Orange Revolution, USA, IMF, Ben Bernanke, , Anton Olff, real estate, rentals, landlords, Russia, global economic crisis, wealth, regulations,

One of the side effects of the Global Economic Crisis-and we have to come up with a new name for this “crisis,” is the steep falloff in the amount of money sent home by immigrants and workers abroad. Many emerging market economies depend on this income to sustain themselves. The fallout from the falloff could be huge…..

Technorati Tags: Global Economic Crisis, State Real Property Cadastre, Bishkek, Chisnau, Kyrgyz Republic, Akylbek Japarov, Armenia, Matthias Luke, Kiel Institute, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, construction, Russian government, Anton Olff, external finance, Russia, United States, Western Europe, Dushanbe, World Bank, IMF, Shigeo Katsu, Tajikistan, Moldova, NGO, CIS countries, recession, Clare Nuttall, Almaty, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), remittance payments, emerging markets,

Feeling the effects of the current Global Economic Crisis, there is little doubt that Russian and Ukrainian Governments are preparing to let their currencies slide even further. The question remains as to how low they will go and what effect they will have on these emerging market economies.

In Ukraine, the hryvna is now hovering around 6 to $1USD, having lost more than 20% over the last 60 days.  The Russian ruble is also getting battered and could see levels against the U.S. dollar that it has not experienced since the financial crisis of the late 1990s.

Devaluations in either economy could exascerbate already high levels of inflation. Russia is particularly vulnerable as it relies on imports of basic food products, plus it derives a significant portion of its revenues for oil and natural gas exports. As oil revenue has declined, and subsequent market interventions have depleted Russia’s foreign currency reserves, Russia could be hit with a higher degree of stagnation than Ukraine. In fact, Ukraine may be able to weather a devaluation better than Russia.

The industrial sector located in Eastern Ukraine could benefit from the lower prices of their steel and chemical products, making their products competitive with China and South Korea. The Ukrainian agricultural sector could also benefit from devaluation.  The fomer “bread basket” of Imperial Russia and the Soviet Union, could regain this title, but with exports to Europe and Asia. This vastly under utilized sector could see a surge in foreign investment next year, or whenever the global credit markets become unfrozen.

In the meantime, businesses and individuals are going to have to adjust to the new reality.

Anton Olff

Technorati Tags: Global Economic Crisis, Ukraine, devaluation, currency reserves, hryvna, Russia, ruble, dollar, Eastern Ukraine, China, South Korea, Soviet Union, exports, Europe, Asia,