 |
Posts Tagged ‘economic crisis’
Tuesday, February 17th, 2009
I don’t agree entirely with this article from russiaprofile.org, though I think the author does make some very valid points applicable to both Russia and Ukraine.
The current economic crisis has caused a great deal of hardship and uncertainly for which the respective governments of Russia and Ukraine seem ill equiped to deal with. The real question will be how people cope? What will they do in the absence of effective actions by their governments?
Revolution is no stranger in Russian history, nor for Ukrainians. However, apathy is also ingrained to a fair degree in the culture as well. Without a fully developed political structure or the means to redress problems, it may only be a matter of how bad things get before apathy is replaced by outrage.
The same could also apply to Europe as the protests in orderly, peaceful Iceland indicate. Indeed the United States may not be immune to radical change if the political process fails to bring about relief.
The soaring rhetoric of newly elected President Obama is already at odds with some of his actions…as the words spoken by Ukrainian leaders during the Orange Revolution days were not matched by deeds. Apathy may wither rather quickly and replaced with a fervor that will be difficult to supress.
| Apathy Rules
Comment by Shaun Walker
Special to Russia Profile |
|
|
Monogorods are Bearing the Brunt of the Financial Crisis in Russia, but They are Unlikely to Become the Focal Point for Massed Political Protests
As the economic crisis takes a toll on most of Russia’s industries, the lives of many people who live and work in small towns that support these industries take a turn for the worse. Theoretically, these would be the first places to look for social unrest, as more workers lose their jobs with no other employers to turn to. But in Russia, this is not the case.
Since studying history at the university and reading “Magnet Mountain,” Stephen Kotkin’s phenomenal tome on the founding of the city of Magnitogorsk in the 1930s, I’ve been fascinated by monogorods.
They’re not a uniquely Soviet phenomenon, of course. There are plenty of towns and cities in countries across the world that are dependent on a single industry, or a single factory. But there’s something extreme about the Russian version – entire settlements, like Magnitogorsk, named after the single industry that is based there and built entirely around it. As so often in Russian, there’s even a cool word for it – monogorod.
I was in the Urals last week and decided to make a trip to one of these settlements. After all, if there is going to be social unrest in this time of financial crisis, then monogorods seemed like the first place to look. Many of the monogorods deal in industries that have taken a major battering over the past few months. The automobile cities, where the production lines have ground to a halt, or – in the Urals, where I was – the metals plants are suffering as Russia’s construction boom has stopped dead in its tracks and demand is down.
In places where there is only one factory that employs half or more of the working-age population, when the factory gets into trouble, so does the town. In many of the industrial cities in the Urals, workers had been sent home on compulsory long holidays, receiving only two thirds of their pay in accordance with Russian law. This also has an effect on the parts of the city not directly linked to the factory. In one town, several kindergartens had been forced to close – parents had no need to send their children there because they now spent all day at home.
I plumped for Asbest as my monogorod of choice. Partly because I was curious to find out what a town of 76,000 inhabitants named after and based on a substance that I thought to be highly dangerous was like, and partly because Uralasbest, the factory that employs nearly half of the population, was in a bad way. It had been suffering for years due to the fact that asbestos is banned in many countries, but it’s taken a further hit with the crisis and the slackening of demand for construction materials. The factory was now only working on weekends, when electricity is cheaper, and several thousand workers had been laid off and put on the two thirds pay.
If I was going to find the beginnings of massed social unrest anywhere, surely this was it. On my rounds of the mayor’s office, the Asbest TV studios (oh yes, Asbestos TV does indeed exist), and various other officials, the mood was upbeat. Yes, it was a bit difficult at the moment, but that has more to do with the evil Western anti-asbestos plot rather than the financial crisis. Asbestos was always a seasonal industry anyway, and orders had come in for March which would mean the plant should get back to full volume soon. There would be no unrest here.
I wasn’t convinced, and went to talk to some locals. They weren’t happy, many of them were boozing when they should have been working, and wondering how they would feed their families if they didn’t get their jobs back. They hoped that the news of the March move to full working weeks was true, but weren’t sure they could fully trust it.
But when I asked them what they would do if things got really bad, and they looked at me blankly. “What do you mean, what would we do?” they asked.
“Would you protest?”
“Against who?”
“The mayor? The regional government? Putin? Medvedev?”
They laughed.
“What would be the point of that?”
With everyone I got the same response. People were worried and unhappy, but didn’t believe that their voice mattered to anyone, and didn’t believe that protests would solve anything. I asked Garry Kasparov what he thought about this – after all, his movement and the other opposition movements surely feel that the financial crisis will merely precipitate what they predicted all along – the demise of the Putin/Medvedev regime. “You went too early,” said Kasparov. He thinks that the first real protests will come late in the spring, when the people realize that things aren’t going to get better after all.
“Maybe these protests will be put down violently when they do come, and if they are, it will send waves all across Russia,” said Kasparov. “I don’t know what will happen but I can be certain that by the end of the year the status quo will have changed.”
He may be right, but after my trip to Asbest, I can’t see monogorods becoming the focal point of public unrest. In fact, in this notoriously apolitical society, I can’t see massive popular protests breaking out at all. The opposition might get a few more people to their protests, but on the whole, a mixture of apathy, a sense of powerlessness, and a lack of viable organizational structures seem to doom any opposition before it starts.
It’s possible, of course, that there really could be a change of mood if things get really bad. But I feel much more inclined to agree with the opinion of a newspaper editor whom I met in Ekaterinburg. “Protests! What on earth are you talking about?” he said, laughing. “You don’t realize how much Russian people can put up with before they start protesting. There won’t be protests. The women will grow potatoes to see them through the hard times, and the men will drink more vodka, and that’ll be the end of it.”
Shaun Walker is the Moscow Correspondent of The Independent. |
Technorati Tags: apathy, Russia, Ukraine, MBS Ltd., Anton Olff, economic crisis, revolution, protest, culture, Europe, President Obama, Orange Revolution, Shaun Walker, russiaprofile.org, Russian industry, Magnet Mountain, Stephen Kotkin, Magnitogorsk, Soviet Union, monogorod, Urals, Uralasbest, Asbest, asbestos, Vladimir Putin, President Medvedev, Gary Kasparov, The Independent
Tags: Anton Olff, apathy, Asbest, asbestos, culture, economic crisis, Europe, Gary Kasparov, Magnet Mountain, Magnitogorsk, MBS Ltd., monogorod, Orange Revolution, President Medvedev, President Obama, protest, revolution, Russia, Russian industry, russiaprofile.org, Shaun Walker, Soviet Union, Stephen Kotkin, The Independent, ukraine, Uralasbest, Urals, Vladimir Putin Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Wednesday, February 11th, 2009
Whom do you think is more accurate in predicting the future: economists OR astrologists? If I were a betting man, I would go with the astrologists. OK…I know that sounds a bit crazy, but answer this question: have economists been any better about predicting the future?
At least we can laugh a bit when astrologists put on their pointy hats and pontificate. We assume…perhaps correctly so, that there is no real science behind their rants. Why trust economists? If we measured the predictions of many economists and astrologists, we would probably find them about equal in their forecasting abilities.
At least the prognostications of astrologists can have a comforting effect, since we can realistically believe that stellar, solar and lunar movements control events to a great extent. Economists tend to fixate on their own version of stars as well as theories based upon arcane data that only they know how to decipher.
Shakespeare did point us in the right direction: the fault is not in the stars, but in our selves.
from www.unian.net
Crisis in Ukraine may last for five years – astrologists
Astrologist Olena Kalantarova forecasts that Ukraine will see a year of ordeal, and the crisis in the country will last for not less than five years.
O.Kalantarova disclosed her forecast to “Segodnya” daily (#26 dated February 10, 2009).
“The situation will stabilize more or less late in March-early in April. And May will bring a financial vortex. A critical situation will loom in October, when we may be drawn into an international conflict. A scandal, connected with the President of Ukraine, will happen in this period. Many riots will take place in 2009”, the astrologist unveiled.
Another astrologist, Ihor Syvak, also forecasts a peak of social protests in September and October.
According to Ihor Nikishyn, head of the Ukrainian Astrologic Institute, February and March will be the most critical period for the national currency – hryvnia. “Hryvnia’s value will begin to stabilize in April, but it will again fluctuate in August and early in October”, I.Nikishyn forecasted.
In his opinion, the national currency may finally stabilize by end of year.
“Since end of April, we may also expect for a growth of demand for steel, on which our economics depends. But the growth will take place very slowly”, the astrologist forecasted.
Tags: Anton Olff, Astrology, economic crisis, economic forecasting, economic theories, Economics, hryvnia, Ihor Nikishyn, Ihor Syvak, international conflict, MBS Ltd., Olena Kalantarova, Segodnya, Shakespeare, social protests, ukraine, Ukrainian Astrologic Institute, www.unian.net Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 10th, 2009
Although there may be gloating on the part of some Russians regarding the fate of their neighbors in Ukraine, this article from Russia Today (ww.russiatoday.com) does reflect the reality here.
As the Ukrainian government goes begging for loans around the World with the IMF holding back on the next tranche of a promised loan, the hryvnia experiencing new lows daily, and workers being laid off throughout Ukraine, the “crisis” is certainly getting worse. The political stalemate is adding to the pain.
Workers suffer under deepening economic crisis in Ukraine
The economic crisis in Ukraine is escalating, and while the government is pointing fingers at each other, social unrest is growing as people lose their jobs or remain unpaid for months.
The crisis is most visible in the Ukrainian city of Kherson, where more than a thousand workers at a combine harvester factory have not received any wages since September.
“They were forcing us to retire. But I didn’t. Where else do we have to go? It’s the same thing everywhere,” said one disgruntled factory worker.
The average salary here is around $US 200, which is barely enough to make ends meet as prices in Ukraine are growing rapidly.
Aleksandra Tkachenko works at the factory and says that she lives in the fear that tomorrow she’ll have nothing left to be able to feed her family. Her entire family now lives off the pension of Aleksandra’s husband, which is less than $US 100 a month.
Recently, her husband suffered a brain hemorrhage and the strain is taking its toll.
“You can’t imagine what a life we life. I’ve spent half of the pension on medicine for my husband, but that won’t even last till the end of the month,” says Tkachenko.
The owners of the factory say they can’t pay the salaries because the combine harvesters are not being sold. The situation in Kherson is one of the first explosions of public rage in Ukraine over the current economic crisis. Experts claim work at almost all factories and mines in the country is either suspended or under threat.
By spring, unemployment is expected to grow by four times, topping almost four million people. The public outcry to the consequences of the economic crisis that is gripping Ukraine is getting louder, as more workers put down their tools to protest.
Unemployment in Ukraine is soon expected to hit levels not seen since the fall of the Soviet Union. Public opinion indicates that what people want is for the government to stop the infighting and to give them the helping hand they desperately need. The crisis of trust among the country’s political elite isn’t helping the situation either.
The president and the opposition blame the government of Yulia Timoshenko for failing to tackle the crisis, or find the right ways to spend the billions of dollars loaned from the International Monetary fund.
Timoshenko says the government needs more money and fewer obstacles from both the parliament and the president. Her latest move – a request for more loans, including five billion dollars from Russia – has yet again provoked the wrath of the president.
“President Yushchenko says the step undertaken by the government without his knowledge is unacceptable and has obvious signs of corruption,” says Irina Vannikova from the Ukrainian Presidential Administration.
With the president and his government failing to agree upon ways out of the crisis, the country plunges ever deeper into a recession, leaving millions of people without work, and in the fear that they will soon have nothing to put on the table.
Tags: Aleksandra Tkachenko, Anton Olff, combine harvesters, corruption, economic crisis, hryvnia, International Monetary Fund, Kherson, MBS Ltd., pensions, President Yushchenko, protest, public opinion, recession, Russia, Russia Today, Soviet Union, ukraine, unemployment, Yulia Timoshenko Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Monday, December 15th, 2008
As a resident of Odessa, I can attest to the fear out there regarding the free fall of the hryvnia. People are downright scared and the empty stores, restaurants and cafes indicate they are not spending.
As this article from www.unian.net states, it is extremely difficult to get dollars and euros at banks or kiosks.
On a positive note, this could force the Ukrainian Government to enact needed changes which were put off during better times. After the crisis recedes, and with economic reforms, Ukraine will be at the forefront of emerging markets.
Panic as Ukraine’s currency plummets
The national currency of Ukraine, whose pro-West government wants to join the European Union, has almost halved in value in the last six months, prompting panic amongst its heavily indebted population.
The sudden fall in the hryvnia has sent Ukrainians rushing to exchange booths to change local money for hard currency, in scenes that recalled the hyperinflation suffered by the country in the early 1990s.
Not only do Ukrainian consumers have to pay back loans taken out in more prosperous times but many will also have to pay them back in dollars.
The hryvnia (UAH) was on Friday trading at 7.49 UAH against the dollar compared with 5.05 UAH at the beginning of the year and 4.84 UAH in July.
The National Bank of Ukraine has allowed the hryvnia to trade freely in line with the conditions of a 16.4-billion-dollar (12.8 billion euro) IMF loan aimed at helping the country through the financial crisis.
The hyrvnia — a currency introduced in 1996 and named after money used in ancient Kiev — has endured the ignominy of suffering one of the worst devaluations, along with the Icelandic krona, in the global financial crisis.
“I consider myself a cultivated gentleman. But at the moment I`m thinking of taking petrol and a lighter and setting the National Bank of Ukraine on fire,” said Egor Sobolev, a journalist who owes 60,000 dollars for his flat.
“We are paid in hryvnia and for the moment our family budget allows us to make monthly payments of 1,000 dollars, but if the hyrvnia falls to 10 or 15 to the dollar the Bank has a big chance of going up in flames!”
As of December 1, Ukrainian consumers had notched up debts of 235.5 billion hryvnia (31 billion dollars) some 70 percent of which (176 billion hryvnia or 23 billion dollars) has been taken out in foreign currency.
Dollars and euros were almost impossible to buy in banks and exchange offices in Ukraine in November as people flocked to trade their hyrvnia for stronger currencies.
The growth in hryvnia-denominated bank deposits was replaced in October by an outflow amounting to 10 percent of investments.
The panic reached a peak earlier this month when a newspaper reported that all dollar bank savings could be converted into hryvnias, a rumour vehemently denied by the authorities.
“Savers can only feel that they have been duped and have reason to be scared of similar surprises in the future,” said the Dzerkalo Tyjnia weekly.
“Who is going to answer for for the devastation of entire layers of Ukrainian society?”
President Viktor Yuschchenko oversaw the currency`s introduction when he was working as head of the central bank in the 1990s.
Ukraine has been among the countries hardest hit by financial turmoil as the plunging price of steel, the country`s main export, has exacerbated a credit crunch and a sharp fall in stock prices.
Underlining the country`s difficulties, Ukrainian industrial production is in freefall, crashing 15.2 percent in November compared to the previous month and 28.6 percent compared to November 2007.
Metals output in November was 23.5 percent lower than in October and a whopping 48.8 percent lower than the same figure for November 2007.
Out of the three major economies of the former Soviet Union — Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine — Ukraine is to see the sharpest slowdown, analysts at UBS said in a bleak research note.
“Ukraine will see the sharpest slowdown among the three countries despite support from the IMF. Its currency will have to devalue given that it has the worst net international asset position,” the UBS analysts said.
But they added that with the conditions of the IMF loan there is a “good chance” that Ukraine might finally start implementing the reforms that it had put off for 10 years.
Technorati Tags: Odessa, Ukraine, hryvnia, www.unian.net, Anton Olff, dollars, euros, Ukrainian Government, economic crisis, European Union, consumers, National Bank of Ukraine, UAH, Kiev, devaluations, Icelandic krona, Egor Sobolev, Dzerkalo Tyjnia, Viktor Yuschenko, stell, credit crunch, industrial production, Soviet Union, Russia, Kazakhstan, IMF, reforms
Tags: Anton Olff, consumers, credit crunch, devaluations, dollars, Dzerkalo Tyjnia, economic crisis, Egor Sobolev, European Union, euros, hryvnia, Icelandic krona, IMF, industrial production, Kazakhstan, Kiev, National Bank of Ukraine, Odessa, reforms, Russia, Soviet Union, stell, UAH, ukraine, Ukrainian Government, Viktor Yuschenko, www.unian.net Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Thursday, December 11th, 2008
|
Richard Hainsworth’s commentary on www.businessneweurope.eu is correct about the current Russian banking system. The global economic crisis has strained even the healthiest banks and systems beyond what they were “engineered” to do.
It will be interesting to see how the Russian Government responds to this. They could for example, recapitalize some banks during periods of seasonal stress, providing short term bridge loans.
The question of long term financing is something that will need to be addressed once the immediate crisis is in a more manageable stage. Russia, as well as other emerging markets-could probably do more to open its banking sector to foreign competition.
Quality not quantity in Russian banking |
|
Richard Hainsworth of RusRating/GlobalRating December 11, 2008
Assessing the asset quality underlying a bank or banking system is an essential prerequisite for making a judgment about its strength. The irrational exuberance of the early 2000s has given way to equally irrational pessimism currently afflicting traders.
The facts are certainly clear: there is a wave of corporate defaults, and Russian banks are having their liquidity and operational risk system tested. Some have failed. Nevertheless, the interpretation of these facts needs to be rational.
Two structural factors need to be considered in such an interpretation. First, the Russian economy has a single tax year, ending on December 31. This means that all contractual obligations, trade transactions and long-standing loan agreements tend to be tied to the year-end. The pressure on all banks and corporates to close operations is always highest in November and December. Consequently, any economic activity peaks at this time, which also means that the strain in a period of turbulence will be severest at this time. It is analytically incorrect to take data points from November and December and extrapolate them linearly into January and February.
Secondly, Russia – just like all the countries of the CIS – does not have any significant source of medium to long term (viz., over a year) funding. At the same time, companies in a period of expansion need funding for three to five years because it takes that long for a new piece of plant or project expansion to be bought, installed and start generating cash. The result is that the real economy needs three-to-five year funding, but the banks can only provide short-term lending. The result is a maturity gap between the needs of the economy and the abilities of the banking sector.
Ordinarily, this is no problem. A functioning economy is a dynamic system and short-term funding is constantly being replenished with interest income and repayments from the real sector. Banks are willing to lend to corporates for longer periods, but for compliance purposes request one-year loan contracts. Corporates hedge their refinancing risks by establishing lines with several banks. However, when there is a liquidity crunch, the banking system as a whole retains liquidity and corporates cannot refinance. Since the loans are one-year long, they come due. They cannot be refinanced, so the corporate defaults. In ordinary times, a default means that the company is weak or mismanaged. But in a time of crisis, the corporate may be strong, but without liquidity. A default in a time of crisis does not mean that the underlying corporate is weak.
Deeper questions
This leads to a much deeper question of finance and economics. If an enterprise or bank is judged to be strong solely on the grounds of its liquidity in a time of global crisis, then what should it do in a time of normality? If it retains levels of liquidity in reserve that would be adequate in times of crisis, then it will be unable to lend those resources for any long period of time. This will reduce the rate at which a banking system can lend to the economy and the ability of the economy to grow and develop.
Returning to Russia, the inability of companies to repay the principle on loans that do not match their borrowing requirements is more about their levels of liquidity going into the crisis. Those loans may still be performing in terms of interest being paid and would not be considered to be in default had the legal form matched the economy substance.
Taking these two factors (intense year-end contractual activity and a contractual mismatch in funding) into consideration, a wave of corporate defaults during a global crisis in November and December does not mean that the Russian economy or the banking system is inherently weak, or that it’s inevitable the crisis will continue into 2009.
Richard Hainsworth is CEO of RusRating/GlobalRating, CFA |
Technorati Tags: Richard Hainsworth, short-term funding, Russian economy, CIS countries, tax year, irrational exuberance, irrational pessimism, traders, corporate defaults, Russian banks, liquidity, Anton Olff, emerging markets, foreign competition, RusRating/Global Rating, Russia, www.businessneweurope.eu, economic crisis, Russian government,
Tags: Anton Olff, CIS countries, corporate defaults, economic crisis, emerging markets, foreign competition, irrational exuberance, irrational pessimism, liquidity, Richard Hainsworth, RusRating/Global Rating, Russia, Russian banks, Russian economy, Russian government, short-term funding, tax year, traders, www.businessneweurope.eu Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
|
|
 |
|
 |
|