 |
Archive for December 11th, 2008
Thursday, December 11th, 2008
Although this article in the Wall Street Journal (www.wsj.com) is about a so-called “trend,” taking place in the United States due to the financial crisis, it is really old news for those who live and work in emerging markets. Keeping money someplace other than a bank is normal in Ukraine, as well as Russia.
China-which has seen the biggest growth of any economy in the last 30 years and has a more developed banking system, insurance (private…and nothing like the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in the USA), annuities, as well as brokerage accounts- money is literally stored in the mattress…or nearby… by a majority of people.
Mistrust of government and financial institutions particularly, is deeply ingrained in Chinese as well as other Asian cultures. Numerous financial panics throughout Chinese history may have something to do with it. The Chinese are big savers as a result.
By some estimates, the average Chinese person saves almost 40% of their income. This is true whether they reside in mainland China, Hong Kong or Taiwan or have migrated elsewhere. This thrift is also a contributing factor to the huge amount of foreign currency reserves that the Chinese Government can draw upon. “Mattress savers” make bank deposits too…at least in China.
Actually, for Americans…what is “new”, is also old. Our parents and grandparents were savers. They did not have credit cards, overdraft protection for their checking accounts, and were frugal due to memories-real or indirect-of the Great Depression. Interesting that my generation is re-learning what we used to dismiss as quaint stories from a bygone era.
DECEMBER 10, 2008
The Mattress Stuffers
By MARK PENN
With E. Kinney Zalesne
As the financial crisis swept across the nation these past few months, one of the first microtrend groups to emerge is the New Mattress Stuffers — people who have lost their trust in the financial world, and are preparing for the next meltdown.
Just as 9/11 created a vast industry in building security, so the recession could create a big industry in personal financial security — a new kind of survival kit. New Mattress Stuffers don’t care about the 10% interest rate on GE preferred stock that Warren Buffett snapped up; they care about making it through if hard times get even worse. As a result, firms which can offer ironclad guarantees of safety will appeal to this new group. These are people who have lost their faith in the housing market, the stock market, their bank, their big corporate employer, their auto company, and their last president. What is left but themselves?
Forget about huge, sweeping megaforces. The biggest trends today are micro: small, under-the-radar patterns of behavior which take on real power when propelled by modern communications and an increasingly independent-minded population. In the U.S., one percent of the nation, or three million people, can create new markets for a business, spark a social movement, or produce political change. This column is about identifying these important new niches, and acting on that knowledge.
In the old days, Mattress Stuffers literally hid all their assets in their homes — construction crews today are still discovering tin cans of cash in walls hidden 75 years ago by people who died without having told anyone about their nest eggs. The New Mattress Stuffers aren’t crotchety misers, though — they’re active Baby Boomers who, until just a few months ago, were heading happily into their 60s with inflated assets, unlimited second-job opportunities, and IRAs crammed full of stocks.
Now, the shocks they are feeling are taking them into strange and uncharted territory. Most Americans are so far removed from holding physical assets that their first reaction is to stuff their money into Treasury Bills instead of into a tin can. But there are other ways they can calm themselves.
The price of gold is down as hedge funds unwind their positions, but the sale of gold coins is up — because New Mattress Stuffers are stockpiling them for themselves and their children. And this was happening even before the crisis hit in full force. Between May and September of this year alone, sales of U.S. Mint gold coins grew by more than 600 percent. Over one million coins have been sold so far this year.
While almost every company in America is seeing a downturn, sales of home safes and vaults are surging. Sales of guns this year are up 8 to 10 percent.
And cash is the new plastic. Our own just-completed Holiday Spending Survey shows that most Americans are going to use more cash and charge less on their credit cards than in the past. Although most of us have lived in a plastic world so long we can barely remember people like my dad who carried around wads of bills, Americans are now seeing the first real dip in credit card sales in decades. Fear of credit and credit cards is a renewed emotion.
To take advantage of these trends, some of the dying post offices might want to open spots for safe deposit boxes instead of P.O. boxes. Investment advisers may start talking about return of your money instead of return on your money. And jewelers may start to tell you to “don’t forget to stash away a diamond or two.”
If the post-war economic expansion brought us the baby boom, this crisis may bring us a baby squeeze — a sharp reduction in births nine months from now, as refraining from having kids is the ultimate consumer pull-back. And instead of staying home, the evidence shows that more couples are going to the movies, with attendance up for this relatively low-cost evening.
People don’t talk much about their mattress-stuffing behavior. It kind of defeats the purpose if you tell people where your stash is. But there’s a hunger out there for security hedges — a gun, some cash, a little gold, a small safe in the bedroom — in case all the ATMs suddenly shut down. The TV shopping channels could be hawking that “Safe Haven” combination right now, a complete home solution.
Technorati Tags: Wall Street Journal, ATMs, TV shopping channels, baby squeeze, movies, safe deposit boxes, jewelers, diamonds, home safes, vaults, guns, U.S. Mint Gold Coins, Americans, Treasury Bills, 9/11, cash, construction crews, Baby Boomers, IRAs, stocks, job opportunities, homes, building secruity, survival kit, GE preferred stock, stock market, corporate employer, Warren Buffet, Anton Olff, Mark Penn, mattress stuffers, frugality, credit cards, overdraft protection, the Great Depression, savings, thrift, China, Hong kong, Taiwan, foreign currrency reserves, financial institutions, Asian culture, Chinese history, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, insurance, annuities, brokerage accounts, mattress, www.wsj.com, United States, financial crisis, emerging markets, trend, Ukraine, Russia, China, banking system,
Tags: 9/11, Americans, annuities, Anton Olff, Asian culture, ATMs, Baby Boomers, baby squeeze, banking system, brokerage accounts, building secruity, cash, China, Chinese history, construction crews, corporate employer, credit cards, diamonds, emerging markets, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, financial crisis, financial institutions, foreign currrency reserves, frugality, GE preferred stock, guns, home safes, homes, Hong Kong, insurance, IRAs, jewelers, job opportunities, Mark Penn, mattress, mattress stuffers, movies, overdraft protection, Russia, safe deposit boxes, savings, stock market, stocks, survival kit, Taiwan, the Great Depression, thrift, Treasury Bills, trend, TV shopping channels, U.S. Mint Gold Coins, ukraine, United States, vaults, Wall Street Journal, Warren Buffet, www.wsj.com Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Thursday, December 11th, 2008
Some of my associates have asked me why I have not posted any news about the recent reformation of the Orange Coalition within the Ukrainian Government. Well…to be honest, I did read the news with some delight. It is not that I am a supporter of any political faction. On the contrary, my focus is business…and business craves stability and predictabilty. The financial crisis has forced political rivals to set aside their differences and come together and address the problems facing Ukraine. MAYBE.
I hate to sound like Machiavelli here, but is there anyone out there who believes that this grand alliance will be nothing more than temporary? There are “no permanent allies, only permanent interests” to paraphrase the Renaissance philosopher. Human nature being what it is-and it is a spectacle to behold-is not about to change because a few politicians have sheathed their metaphoric swords and embraced each other.
Ultimately, Ukraine will be stabilize when its politicians realize that they can benefit more from that stability, even if it means that they have to temper their personal ambitions to the greater good. This could come as a result of crisis, or it could come when Ukraine grows-and it will continue to do that-to the point when its politics have evolved. So far…and to its credit…Ukraine has not devolved to a command and control economy, nor has the democratic political trajectory been altered.
The bottom line for many of us who live, work and invest in Ukraine is that things will improve over the long term. Ukraine is in fact, more advanced than many of her critics want to admit-including some Western Europeans who recently used this to deny a road map to NATO.
Technorati Tags: Ukraine, Ukrainian Government, command and control economy, democracy, NATO, Western Europe, Anton Olff, politicians, Machiavelli, human nature, Orange Coalition, business, stability, predictability, political faction,
Tags: Anton Olff, Business, command and control economy, democracy, human nature, Machiavelli, NATO, Orange Coalition, political faction, politicians, predictability, stability, ukraine, Ukrainian Government, Western Europe Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Thursday, December 11th, 2008
|
Richard Hainsworth’s commentary on www.businessneweurope.eu is correct about the current Russian banking system. The global economic crisis has strained even the healthiest banks and systems beyond what they were “engineered” to do.
It will be interesting to see how the Russian Government responds to this. They could for example, recapitalize some banks during periods of seasonal stress, providing short term bridge loans.
The question of long term financing is something that will need to be addressed once the immediate crisis is in a more manageable stage. Russia, as well as other emerging markets-could probably do more to open its banking sector to foreign competition.
Quality not quantity in Russian banking |
|
Richard Hainsworth of RusRating/GlobalRating December 11, 2008
Assessing the asset quality underlying a bank or banking system is an essential prerequisite for making a judgment about its strength. The irrational exuberance of the early 2000s has given way to equally irrational pessimism currently afflicting traders.
The facts are certainly clear: there is a wave of corporate defaults, and Russian banks are having their liquidity and operational risk system tested. Some have failed. Nevertheless, the interpretation of these facts needs to be rational.
Two structural factors need to be considered in such an interpretation. First, the Russian economy has a single tax year, ending on December 31. This means that all contractual obligations, trade transactions and long-standing loan agreements tend to be tied to the year-end. The pressure on all banks and corporates to close operations is always highest in November and December. Consequently, any economic activity peaks at this time, which also means that the strain in a period of turbulence will be severest at this time. It is analytically incorrect to take data points from November and December and extrapolate them linearly into January and February.
Secondly, Russia – just like all the countries of the CIS – does not have any significant source of medium to long term (viz., over a year) funding. At the same time, companies in a period of expansion need funding for three to five years because it takes that long for a new piece of plant or project expansion to be bought, installed and start generating cash. The result is that the real economy needs three-to-five year funding, but the banks can only provide short-term lending. The result is a maturity gap between the needs of the economy and the abilities of the banking sector.
Ordinarily, this is no problem. A functioning economy is a dynamic system and short-term funding is constantly being replenished with interest income and repayments from the real sector. Banks are willing to lend to corporates for longer periods, but for compliance purposes request one-year loan contracts. Corporates hedge their refinancing risks by establishing lines with several banks. However, when there is a liquidity crunch, the banking system as a whole retains liquidity and corporates cannot refinance. Since the loans are one-year long, they come due. They cannot be refinanced, so the corporate defaults. In ordinary times, a default means that the company is weak or mismanaged. But in a time of crisis, the corporate may be strong, but without liquidity. A default in a time of crisis does not mean that the underlying corporate is weak.
Deeper questions
This leads to a much deeper question of finance and economics. If an enterprise or bank is judged to be strong solely on the grounds of its liquidity in a time of global crisis, then what should it do in a time of normality? If it retains levels of liquidity in reserve that would be adequate in times of crisis, then it will be unable to lend those resources for any long period of time. This will reduce the rate at which a banking system can lend to the economy and the ability of the economy to grow and develop.
Returning to Russia, the inability of companies to repay the principle on loans that do not match their borrowing requirements is more about their levels of liquidity going into the crisis. Those loans may still be performing in terms of interest being paid and would not be considered to be in default had the legal form matched the economy substance.
Taking these two factors (intense year-end contractual activity and a contractual mismatch in funding) into consideration, a wave of corporate defaults during a global crisis in November and December does not mean that the Russian economy or the banking system is inherently weak, or that it’s inevitable the crisis will continue into 2009.
Richard Hainsworth is CEO of RusRating/GlobalRating, CFA |
Technorati Tags: Richard Hainsworth, short-term funding, Russian economy, CIS countries, tax year, irrational exuberance, irrational pessimism, traders, corporate defaults, Russian banks, liquidity, Anton Olff, emerging markets, foreign competition, RusRating/Global Rating, Russia, www.businessneweurope.eu, economic crisis, Russian government,
Tags: Anton Olff, CIS countries, corporate defaults, economic crisis, emerging markets, foreign competition, irrational exuberance, irrational pessimism, liquidity, Richard Hainsworth, RusRating/Global Rating, Russia, Russian banks, Russian economy, Russian government, short-term funding, tax year, traders, www.businessneweurope.eu Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
|
|
 |
|
 |
|